Seems a fairly clear 4-bet, albeit one that narrows my range to basically AAxx. I could have called, but I'm pretty deep with the player in the CO and I've got aces with a suit and want to maximise my chances to win a big pot with them. This is probably towards the bottom of my 4-bet range though, ideally it would obviously be better to have two broadways or two lower cards (and two suits). When the call I assume they have some sort of non-ace big pair or a strong rundown.

Seems a pretty clear continuation. Still got my aces, and I block all flopped straights/straight draws (23, 36, 68, 89), most of which I struggle to see my opponent having in their 4-bet calling range pre.

Feels like a pretty gin card here. Sure one of the draws gets there, but I block it. It also gives me top set in case the villain managed to bink sevens. I think I bet way too small. My thought process was trying to size a river shove on pretty much any river, but in retrospect I think I should have just gone 60-75% pot.

Annoying that back-door clubs got there, but I'm not overly worried by it as there aren't many hands I can think of that would 3-bet and calla 4-bet pre, then call flop with clubs. At least that make sense. To me the only thing that makes sense at the moment is a flopped set or really stubborn two pair, so I stick it in.

I lost. Which sucked, but I see their hand is Qh4h8s2s which is trash. They hanve two suits but largely unconnected pre that 3-bets and calls a large 4-bet. They call a c-bet with a pair of 4s, backdoor spades and a couple of backdoor straights. the ace on the turn kills the spades but gives them a gutshot which they hit on the river.