Asdfghjkl1

11:58 you allow multiple sizes, is there not a more efficient way of doing this in GTOwiz? as in, can we not allow fewer sizes to make our decision making easier and clearer if we got it "right"?

Hey Ben

Curious what you have been working on for the last little while having taken a step back from poker if you are able to share?

idea for your next video:

If you were a small or midstakes grinder in 2021, how would go about getting to the top or improving as efficiently / effectively as possible. Everything from which areas you would work on first, how you'd identify leaks, picking which areas to work on, how you would work on these areas, what ratio of play to study, what your study would look like, any books, tools, content you would consume, etc.

Assume there will become a point where you stop making videos, showing us which path to take would be the greatest gift :)

Hi Luke - at 22:30 you talk about global frequency, could you please expand on this? and the implications on this hand.

Sizing of bet @ 21mins also confused me, wonder if that is relevant to what you are talking about at 22:30...

Hi Steve

Really enjoyed the video and i believe it provides a framework for how we can level up the most efficiently

I was wondering, how do we identify which spots we should work on and in what order, as a few examples:

• is there a "list" of spots that come up most frequently (meaning we need to ensure we are playing these right)

or

• is there a bb/100 we "should" be achieving in each spot for us to identify where our biggest leaks are

Not sure if i have worded that particularly well, but i guess i am looking to identify which spots i need to work on most and in what order i should do so.

thanks for the video, enjoyed it as always.

i know you don't do many theory videos, but your bet sizing is extremely considered, would really appreciate a theory video on what sizing we should be using and when from yourself.

Great video. a few questions,

how does PIO calculate R in order to show EV?

do you think it would be a useful output on pio to show R? Maybe it does already without having to calculate it?)

thanks

thanks man, could you please explain what you mean by "conserved" solver results?

Would be appreciated if you can comment back here or link to response if you do get one in the PIO thread. :)

find this very interesting "Yet it seems like the bigger oop bets, and thus the small the spr, the more often we raise instead of calling. For example, if oop is forced to bet pot or check, ip now raises 25%.", no idea why this would be the case, any further thoughts on this?

hi Juan, how concerned should we be that if we fold the JTs on the turn we are now effectively overfolding ?

Hi Saulo

At 6:30, you say you block his check backs, could you please expand on this? not sure I follow what you are saying

thanks

paging all RIO coaches, Papes post on what he'd like to see has 18 likes and counting... look no further if you are struggling for video ideas

for anyone else having the issue you can change back in table graphics from "new pokerstars graphic engine"

very frustrating, tables are slow, cant resize to size I like and saved layouts are screwed

Thanks BigFiszh, that’s exactly the kind of advice I was looking for and yes I was looking more for identifying than fixing at this stage.

Certainly going to play around with those methods!

Wonder if there are techniques lurking out there...

thanks Saulo, appreciate your thoughts

I am surprised this didn't get more responses, would have thought a lot of people are looking to identify their leaks through database analysis?

Hi Paul

I’ve been doing quite a bit with Snowie, I am really curious how useful a learning tool you believe it is?

I have read many mixed reviews, the outputs are sometimes funky and sometimes don’t align with pio, all of which concerns me

Thanks

at 28min on qq6, could you please explain why do we choose almost half pot sizing?

at 40mins we bet 1/3rd on T76sdd board, is this your standard sizing on this board or are you mixing with bigger sizing? on boards such as this I am always going with a larger sizing in an attempt to simplfy things - wondering if this is a mistake.

i also have a question on this.... if pio throws out a highly mixed strategy, how do you go about simplifying this strategy to ensure we aren't losing too much EV, but make it manageable to implement? is there a short cut rather than node lock, re-run sim etc.?

at 7:40 after we 3bet 77 on table 2 and check flop and turn we are obviously capped, in your position I have found myself calling down in this spot potentially too light as a result. any advice on this?