HARSHEEL's avatar


1 points

Post | HARSHEEL posted in PLO: standard live PLO hand??

5/10 live plo game seat 3: 4000 , seat 4: 2500, seat 5: 500 , seat 8: 1300

Seat 3 is UTG (slightly losing reg) and he opens to 40 UTG, UTG + 1 (nit reg) calls 40, seat 5 (losing reg) has just dusted off 300 bb in an orbit and is buying in 500 every hand calls the 40, I pot to 240 with Q1084hhdd, seat 3 calls, seat 4 folds, seat 5 jams for 500 and i reraise all in.

Would appreciate some help :)

Nov. 9, 2016 | 9:54 p.m.

Check call is standard, does your play have value against a full range of his hands if you are raising and folding to a re raise? Also. what is your image in the game i.e. what range of hands is he putting you on when he raises? Once you solve that, combine in what range are you putting him on and discount the blocker hands... :)

Sept. 6, 2016 | 2:39 a.m.

its a shove :)

Sept. 6, 2016 | 2:35 a.m.

Comment | HARSHEEL commented on wrap as 3betcaller

There are a lot of factors that cause plays that seem ideal in a vacuum to have an overestimated expected value which leads to the conception of exploitative play such as above. :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 5:43 p.m.

Post | HARSHEEL posted in PLO: standard hand??

6 handed PLO (live)

seat 1 (nlhe player/nit) (SB)
seat 2(havent played a lot of hands but playing TAG this session after being up a lot and now a small winner) (BB) (5500)
seat 3(donk)
seat 4(donk)
seat 5(Hero(LAG image)) (HJ) (10,700)
seat 6(rec player(down 20k(on tilt))) (button) (just bought in for 4900)

I had AdQs5s5d and it folds to me and I open to 100, button calls, sb folds, and BB calls. Pot (310)

The flop comes out Qcd8d4s, BB checks, I bet 300, button calls and BB calls. Pot(1210)

The turn is the Ace of spades, Qc8d4sAs, BB checks, I bet 1000, button raises to 3k, BB goes all in, what are the range of hands that should call here?

I would appreciate some help on this hand. Thanks.

Sept. 5, 2016 | 5:34 p.m.

Comment | HARSHEEL commented on 5678 All In Preflop?

this game is playing deep you have to call it off after u cold call the 4 bet, also, folding to the 4 bet is 50/50. Flip a coin. :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 4:57 p.m.

@disharmonist what is wrong with potting on the turn here?


Sept. 5, 2016 | 4:23 p.m.

1) If we are against calling ranges from all 5 players such as sets. straights, and combo draws, dont you think a big portion which is the combo draws gets an advantage if we just call? It lets any of the players exploit so many turns such as
a) bluff on diamonds without draw
b) value bet draws that got there for free.

Do the two scenarios above get undermined by the fact that

1) "getting more people to call. You might even prefer to get it in here vs. multiple opponents because again, most likely you're beat on the flop, and your nutted draw benefit from getting more in the pot."

2) and the scenario where we are heads up against a button?


Sept. 5, 2016 | 4:19 p.m.

I agree with @jnandez87;what you do here is very player specific. In the past I have been very sporadic with this situation leaning between potting and peeling off after leading out and getting raised. I have faced slightly similar situations recently and SPR has played a big role in my decision making. Given the stack sizes above, your table image becomes the leading factor in whether or not a majority of the opponent's range calls your all. Next, you need to consider how profitable this situation is relative to peeling off and getting a turn to influence your opponent's calling range to commit his chips where you still are ahead. :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 4:03 p.m.

its never a call :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 3:49 p.m.

It's definitely oversimplifying things if you dont take into consideration two street EV for certain hand combinations like Jonna mentioned. However; your intuition is correct a lot of 4 card combos discounting the Ace are very close to putting more money in. It's been a while since your posted so I am assuming you were able to get your answer? I just did about twenty minutes of math and sims on this and the results are fairly straight forward. :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 2:41 p.m.

@CodyWheeler for some reason I completely skipped over your comment. Sorry about that :


Sept. 5, 2016 | 2:28 p.m.

BB leading here a fairly big size give us multiple advantages; a key one being that certain hands in our range become weighted to extract more value against a fairly wide range of our opponents hands



Can we get more runitonce hoodies? I am about the same size you are and I wouldnt mind the batch you guys modeled after you?

Sept. 5, 2016 | 2:27 p.m.

@forhayley i was going to read the essays u guys wrote but i only got to the first line about being hostile in seacombe's reply and lost interest. A year or so ago this was such as clear open for me and I was so clueless now that I think about the spot retrospectively. However; I was lucky, I intuitively started limping with the intention of back raising without even knowing why :)

@jmarcer enough time has gone on


Sept. 5, 2016 | 1:54 p.m.

Call :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 1:47 p.m.

you have to fold the turn without doing any math. In the long run you are losing so much money :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 1:45 p.m.

I think this is a live hand. It's a fold here onto the next one. Think about true ranges and SPR :)

Sept. 5, 2016 | 1:38 p.m.

high stakes forum FTW

Sept. 4, 2016 | 2:05 p.m.

Yes u r the best :)

Aug. 25, 2016 | 11:42 p.m.

Comment | HARSHEEL commented on 2/5/T 3 handed

Turn raise all day :)

Aug. 25, 2016 | 12:33 a.m.

Light at the end of the tunnel :)

Aug. 25, 2016 | 12:30 a.m.

Sorry, this is stuff u have to pay a lot of money to learn. :)

Aug. 25, 2016 | 12:30 a.m.

Comment | HARSHEEL commented on $10/20 6max

Lolz for sure a troll if you're playing micro or low and took a shot u shouldn't be playing these games :)

Aug. 25, 2016 | 12:28 a.m.

puke at Folding kk, if you are weighting your Iso range you have to adjust by having minimal if any fold equity post flop :)

Aug. 25, 2016 | 12:21 a.m.


Aug. 25, 2016 | 12:17 a.m.

Post | HARSHEEL posted in PLO: 6 handed 10/25 PLO live

Aug. 23, 2016 | 5:05 p.m.

Load more