cozaro's avatar

cozaro

18 points

Post | cozaro posted in Chatter: Another payment option please!

Hello guys!

I can't sign up anymore now that Neteller don't let us use credit card. Is any possibility to add neteller as payment option?

Thanks!

Jan. 27, 2017 | 4:17 p.m.

Comment | cozaro commented on $1/$2 Live Zoom Session

Is there any specific reason to open 2.25bb instead the std. 3bb?

Aug. 19, 2016 | 2:06 p.m.

Comment | cozaro commented on $1/$2 Live Zoom Session

31:30 w 26d, looks like an easy call to me by the close odds, you won't have much implied odds by the 7, but 3 would be really nice.

Aug. 19, 2016 | 1:48 p.m.

Comment | cozaro commented on $1/$2 Live Zoom Session

Hey Javier!

Can you explain your size bet at 22:40 with 8Ts?

Ty!

Aug. 19, 2016 | 1:14 p.m.

One of the best videos i have seen here, i hope this open my mind to gear up my game. More videos like this one pls! U already number 1 video maker here for me in NL holdem.

Do you think those bluffs vs fishs is been lucrative, cause your stats is based on the whole field, i think if you filter somehow for only recreational players you may have a higher WTSD% betting river.

Thanks!

April 13, 2016 | 12:31 a.m.

Amazing video as always! Thanks!

April 4, 2016 | 10:12 p.m.

Comment | cozaro commented on Bluffcatching Spots

I think K9o is very likely, but K4o is way off defending vs 3x. Btw in this spot i think i am very unbalanced towards bluffs too.

I been thinking but i couldn't get to any conclusion, because Ad8- and gutshots w one of diamonds are very good raises, how can us get balanced in this spot Tyler? Or anyone else.

April 4, 2016 | 2:34 p.m.

Comment | cozaro commented on Bluffcatching Spots

Amazing video! Thanks!

By the way, last hand, as you said he can maybe value bet AJ river, i think 9Ts should be a better bluff raise than J9s.

April 1, 2016 | 4:16 p.m.

March 28, 2016 | 8:02 p.m.

Thanks for the vid!

March 26, 2016 | 7:25 p.m.

The QQ hand 37:00 looks to me a more complex hand. I have few thoughts. First, for the river, i think we don't need have a balanced checking range because most time villains won't have a bluff range for the river, almost all of his hands will have at least some showdown value.
Checking or not the QQ i think must be based on his calling range at river.

2nd, turn is way more complicated, but making a bigger bet as you said and doing this for all range is going to be good and makes the hand easier, but i don't know if it is the best option, maybe we can do 2 sizes and split our range between these 2 size bets, maybe 2/3 for hands like QQ that are very vulnerable in this board and 1/2 for sets and straight and split bluffs and draws between both ranges, but as our sets/straight range is big enough you could place all bluffs and hands like 99-QQ place draws.

I'm saying all of this thinking our range is strong enough to bet 100% of the hands at turn, so no checking range for turn.

March 26, 2016 | 6:50 p.m.

Can u say your color coding?

March 17, 2016 | 8:57 p.m.

Load more
Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy