Vincent Videau
37 points
Does anyone have tried to compare the EV of oppening 3x 3.5x vs 2.25 2.5x in an high rake environnement on monkersolver ? Or something similar that we could trust.
A lot of coach on RIO have divergent opinion about this subject. It's hard for me to continue playing when the basic is not optimal.
Aug. 23, 2018 | 10:02 a.m.
Does anybody knows someone very good who's coaching ? Even if it's expensive. Thanks.
Aug. 23, 2018 | 10 a.m.
Not possible :/
June 8, 2018 | 5:27 p.m.
Hi, given that i hate how monkersolver is designed, and i would spend to much effort for poor result by solving those things. I'm wondering if someone did some study about how we should play with 6.66% rake with CAP 2 for 2 players 3 for 3-4 players and 4 for 5+ players.
At the end it's a lot of rake, mostly 12bb/100. I'm wondering what is a good winrate at 25 / 50 NL for this rake.
And should i keep opening 2.5x ? Or switches to a bigger open raise size like 3x 3.5x ?
I really feel like trying to exploit some preflop overfolding by using small sizing, is really make me burn a lot of money, because even if they are overfolding decently, the winnings money that outcome from this is killed by all the rake when they call or 3bet.
Feel free to PM me if you're also interessted by this. Thanks.
June 8, 2018 | 9:14 a.m.
Does the small blind is included into the pot ?
May 28, 2018 | 6:38 a.m.
Up ?
May 23, 2018 | 8:07 a.m.
the pot is big, but the betsize is small.
I would include AJo and KQo almost always here.
I don't think we can fold here given the betsizing, i think it's just a call.
May 16, 2018 | 7:16 a.m.
Hi, i still trying to find the perfect game plan that i suppose a lot of top reg i probably using, but obv not sharing.
PIO has done some free things, but i don't like their sizing for 3betting at the BB.
Maybe someone have some usefull information ? Thanks.
May 14, 2018 | 12:53 p.m.
very nice video ty
keep talking as much as you want , but buy a new microphone quickly !
April 21, 2018 | 11:31 p.m.
Nice video thanks !
April 20, 2018 | 9:05 a.m.
I did manage to see the range, but your range doesn't containt 5bet A.I range, it stopped to call4bet :/
April 18, 2018 | 9:18 a.m.
Do you know how i can visualise those text files in PIO ? Thanks.
April 17, 2018 | 7:01 a.m.
Thans a lot man, really. It will be a significant improving in my game.
April 16, 2018 | 6:25 p.m.
0.008% damn it's very long. I've got one of the best machine to run PIO and it's still very very long
April 16, 2018 | 4:11 p.m.
Hi, i'm trying to see the difference between having one bet sizing 25% on QJ2b in single raised pot, (BTN vs BB) and having 3 differents bet sizing 25 50 130.
How do i see the EV that we loose when we just use one sizing ? Because the difference in the EV strategy is just like 1,1% of the pot. And i just feel like this would maybe chance a lot if i keep the solver to run until 0% exploitability.
Maybe 1,1% is a lot in the long run, but i'm a bit surprised because that differences of EV seems very volatile , depends a lot of how many time we let the solver runs.
Thanks.
April 16, 2018 | 12:41 p.m.
April 16, 2018 | 12:34 p.m.
In a lot of spot snowie is exploitable to a 5bet shove. I think because he trains to play with min5bet sometimes but not against 5bet shove.
I don't know, are you guys 4betting Axo like Snowie do ? It's not what most of coach advices here
April 10, 2018 | 4:18 p.m.
Hi, i'm trying to know what is the best approach, between the snowie approach (use Axs as a bluff and cap heavily our range on all flush board), or the approach of most of the top reg, that i imagine is a mix of Axs and some trash suited hands like small T-2xs.
If some guys have used PIO preflop solver, i'm curious to know if he 3bets some of the time that trashy suited combo.
Imo, at highrake environnement, i could imagine that we should be looking more torwards snowie approach.
I really would like to heard more thoughts about this.
It's really hard to trust snowie for me, even preflop, just the way he plays seems sometimes way too much out of line.
Especially when he gets 4bets or he make a 4bet.
Thanks guys.
April 10, 2018 | 9:28 a.m.
A) I would use PIO solver
B) I would bet 75% with one sizing on the river, we shouldn't lost so much EV compared to 2 betsizing + the effort to use 2 betsizes.
April 8, 2018 | 1:50 p.m.
Why aren't you x/shoving 47cc ? Pure polarized vs bluffcatcheur situation with very big blockers aspect.
Have you some advice to complete a near perfect preflop 4bet strategy ? Thanks for the video :)
April 8, 2018 | 1:43 p.m.
Hi, thanks for the video Tyler, on the 997 on the turn when you said that the aggressor (3bet) must defend 24% to protect him from auto profit , are you just calculing this with standard formula Bet/Bet+Pot ? Or something more complicated that includes barrels frequency that protect x/f range too ?
April 3, 2018 | 5:06 p.m.
Ok i did make a mistake, let's play sad dragon ball song haha, i love your video :)
March 31, 2018 | 7:33 p.m.
Very good video thanks.
March 17, 2018 | 5:36 p.m.
Thanks for your answer.
March 14, 2018 | 12:54 p.m.
Hi, thanks for the video, i'm a bit surprised that you don't limp 22 UTG, i would expect those marginal pp to play very well in a limping range like most of CS. Don't you limping more than you would open ?
March 14, 2018 | 12:25 p.m.
Question :
Is it different if he shoved or made a big raise on flop?
Could we just fold exploitable there?
If he X/shove the flop : the odd is around 33% so it could gives us an incentive to fold but I believe that a X/shove range tend to be more aggro-spewy than a X/sized-raise range.
So I wouldn't considering folding against a X/shove but thinking about it against a X/sized-raise
May 5, 2017 | 12:18 p.m.
FLOP : It's maybe close, but I was wondering about a half pot stab, just to exploit :
- the fact that MP reg will fold a vast majority of the time when he checks here
- the fact that UTG fish has a very wide range and we can expect some FE also
If MP is XF 90% and UTG XF 40%, we get a 36% FE against both of them.
TURN :
Considering the fish, there is definitely value to get by raising the turn (even if he X twice and seems weak here).
Considering the reg, I can't see any draw playing like this so I think calling IP is more interesting to get more value on the river.
Considering both of them.. I don't know :-p
Nov. 18, 2016 | 10:44 a.m.
Ok so TT+ AQ+ very most of the time, and wider with PP and worse when stacks are going down ?
Since we need ~40% equity in the spot above, that means we're close to BE with our hand.
Nov. 17, 2016 | 7:17 p.m.
So would you call it here :p ?
Yeah i'm very carefull on table selection , the pool is a lot of mediocre regular, and a bit of poor fish, but the common table look like one fish, et some mediocre regular. I think 5BB is achievable, i'm just guessing if we can win more.
June 8, 2018 | 6:05 p.m.