35/14 188
FCB 58

Interesting that solver would x/r for a 1/2 (mixing with folds, calling is slightly -ev). Which kind of makes sense against good reg. With intention to fold to 3b shove and checking most rivers. (check/calling on most of them)

Not sure if this kind of fish is going to be more bluff or value heavy. Without the river flush, I would definitely x/c. However, since he is UTG, his range is probably a bit tighter (even if he is a fish - he is a bit tighter pre anyway). Therefore its harder for him to be massively overbluffing. 87s, QcJc,9c8c and few AcXc are his natural bluffs. On the value part, he can have KQs (maybe sometimes KQo and AK as well), KJs, AsXs,8s7s,9s8s,TT,KTs and possibly 55,66. Combining his possible value and bluffs together, I think its much harder for him to be underbluffing, so that we should be more inclined to call