50nl fish vs 200nl fish

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

50nl fish vs 200nl fish

Hi, I'm a 50nl player playing on a hudless site.
Ive noticed Higher stakes have a lot more polarized version of fish. Tables are normally 5 regs and 1 huge fish losing at atleast 35-50bb/100. The fish at 50nl are nitty ( ex: tank folding Aqo on Q 7 5 2 3 vs triple barrel in 3bet pot sb vs mp) . They play pretty regularly and probably been playing poker a long time. And reason theyre not alot of them at 200nl+ is probably because they'll bleed alot more money than on 50nl.

Exploiting these types of fish is a bit harder since theyre not super obvious exploits and not having an HUD/hh doesn't help.
I would rather play against a 80b/100 losing fish and 4 regs vs 3 26bb/100 losing fish(who pay 3x more rake than a single fish) and 2 regs .
And I think not having an HUD or database is a big disadvantage towards improving and finding exploits vs these smaller fish.

Looking for advice from higher stakes players to improve on maximally exploiting these "smaller fish. Also would moving to a HUD friendly site help improve my game by a whole lot?

Loading 6 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy