Villain was very aggressiv over the 260 hands I have on him. He is playing 27/20 and his F2 3bet is 46%.

He x/r the flop 17% and F2 cbet overall 50% (not a big sample)

On the flop I think a 70% Ps cbet is fine.

On the turn I do not give him 44/55/77 anymore I do think he can x/c his flushes and flushdraws and ofc. his OPs:

My thought process was like:

I have a valuebet vs. his OPs and FD, the few 88 + flushes should not be to relevant. I decided to bet small, that he is not able to fold his OPs and FD and make him able to do a mistake with some random hands he wanted to float.

I think this is flawed:

1. His range is much stronger than I expected:

 - I have 0% Equity vs his straights and flushes

 - Villain has with all his FDs at least 30% 

2. When I bet that small he can not do any mistakes:

 - Villain needs 23% equity (without river implieds) for a call, as I said he has over 30% with every draw

 - He can not have any random hands he is now pushing, because I look weak! He is not x/calling the Flop w JhTh etc ever!

Afterwards I think now, that I have an easy checkback on the turn and have to evaluate the river again. 

Do you agree with me? Any other thoughts about the hand?

Thx for your help