PokerStars - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com

Hero (BTN): 122.6 BB
SB: 249.4 BB
BB: 190.6 BB
UTG: 123.2 BB
MP: 192.4 BB
CO: 87.4 BB

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has Qc Kh
fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 2.4 BB, SB calls 2 BB, fold

Flop : (5.8 BB, 2 players) Kc Ac 2d
SB checks, Hero checks

Turn : (5.8 BB, 2 players) 7h
SB checks, Hero bets 1.8 BB, SB calls 1.8 BB

River : (9.4 BB, 2 players) Kd
SB bets 9 BB, Hero raises to 41 BB, SB calls 32 BB

Hero shows Qc Kh (Three of a Kind, Kings)
(Pre 74%, Flop 82%, Turn 86%)

SB shows Th Ks (Three of a Kind, Kings)
(Pre 26%, Flop 18%, Turn 14%)

Hero wins 87.6 BB

The first mistake imo is not betting otf. I feel like I have the range advantage here and that I should be range betting for folds and protection. Second thing, on the turn my sizing should be bigger. Now I'm just giving villian good odds for his draws and this small sizing isn't going to keep him from folding air so I might as well bet bigger. Now on the river I'm pretty much sure he has a king here. He won't check a set of deuces twice, he won't check a set of sevens after flop going x/x. He can't have an AK, he would have 3bet it pre. Now if I'd gone with more reasonable sizing on the turn or bet the flop (also am I betting the turn if I had range bet the flop?), I wouldn't have the problem of how am I going to get money in. Now I'm deciding between a big raise (used here) or a shove. In hindsight I don't see him having many combos that he would fold to a shove that would call this sizing, so as played I'm thinking I should have shoved.