Seems like a standard hand, went very wrong in-game
Posted by Degradavais
Posted by
Degradavais
posted in
Low Stakes
Seems like a standard hand, went very wrong in-game
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $10.00
SB: $10.00
BB: $18.16
UTG: $12.06 (Hero)
MP: $9.02
CO: $43.89
SB: $10.00
BB: $18.16
UTG: $12.06 (Hero)
MP: $9.02
CO: $43.89
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is UTG with
J
A
, , ,
Standard open, bottom of range
Flop
($0.75)
T
9
K
,
cbet was standard for me, however I just put in his range in equity calc and not doing good against it (35%)
cbet size questionable as well
really dislike my play here
cbet size questionable as well
really dislike my play here
Turn
($1.25)
T
9
K
2
,
we have no spades, so he picks up those outs as well. very bad T cbet
River
($2.91)
T
9
K
2
Q
, ,
hit the nut straight, however flush also comes in
he jams, in-game was thinking I beat all jacks. not considering he would not jam those jacks except flushes.
he jams, in-game was thinking I beat all jacks. not considering he would not jam those jacks except flushes.
Final Pot
UTG
lost and shows a straight, Ten to Ace.
CO wins and shows a flush, King high.
CO wins $23.18
Rake is $1.09
CO wins and shows a flush, King high.
CO wins $23.18
Rake is $1.09
he has TJs
First of all I know I played this hand bad, was end the end of a losing session.
However, I want to learn from it.
Question: do you cbet this flop?
Checkfolding seems too weak against a player who flats alot of hands pre.
Checkcalling can't be optimal either?
If cbet, what size & why?
Loading 6 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.