BALANCEDLUCK

trmahabir trmahabir I play against you haha. I messaged

Sweety (hope you're a girl)

You have played as many hands over a year as I can in a month. The sample is a close to meaningless one. Check out ''Poker Varience Calculator.Com'' You were lucky enough to run above EV. There is a win right there.

With such little voulme you can't be playing much or imrpoving much at all if any. You may well study how you play.

You may get a noob with a trust fund to stake you or something but I wouldn't hold out for a poker investor. Maybe some degen will, what do I know, there is one born every minute.

If you had 6 X that volume over the last 6 months with 6 graphs of which 5 were in line with the OP then with a legal framework I'd stake you. Thing is, if that sample was refelctive, you would only get half of your winnings then! That may demotivate you to play even more than you have been this last year.

4 Tables Zoom or Rush and Cash and you're talking 600 hands per hour. So that's like 100 hours worth of work ;)

Living the dream

Reagards

Reality X

P.S

Still it's a decent graph and shows promise, maybe with some work ethic you could do something. To be fair you did it with very little rake back. I think you likely have a reasonable understanding of PLO.

Wish you all the best

GL ;)

There will never come a "uninterrupted hot streak" unless it's like a 5 hand sample or something, you get my point.
I hear you about how hard it is when you only have ever had bad luck.
When I started playing on Full Tilt I used to two table and over my first ever 15k hands ( took like 6 weeks pre zoom) I had such bad luck that when it was measured it came out at 33 to 1 that I would have such bad look. i thought poker was rigged at that point. AA losing to 45s or 67o pr whatevr was happening, it seemed endless.
It's not rigged, it dopes even out, it helps if you get fast volume in and if you are ahead and get sucked out on often it's at least a sign you're getting your money in good.
As for the hand his 6% 3bet maybe higher due to the spot. You're oop so having the betting lead could help fold EQ post flop, you block his best hands so may get a fold, call Ip with suited AK's sometimes if they are bluffy or spewy post, it's nivce to have what they rep, 4bet AKo when oop . GL

I'm playing 6 max so can add value for most positions at the table. I play higher but that dosen't bother me, I like your work eithic. I'm going to send you a DM. I'm ready to start doing some studying today

Would love to join and add value. Played 100 PLO in the past doing great over large samples. Quit due to rake increases and having a great paying job outside of poker. Couldn't stay away and back in the NL streets now due to loving the game. Let's set a date and time to study and get this turned into reality. Everyone must have ambition or wouldn't be here

Fair ... I got more out of that expanation than the matrix code. I'm Cypher, I see blonde, red head and so on.. I would needed to be Neo to make sense of that 1st post that WAS there ha
Thanks you have added SOME value

some people have the communication / people skills of a rock

check your own link it sold out months ago and only ever did the turn I believe on one texture

look there is no free pio and preflop pio costs a bomb. you just seem trolling or autistic

Are you trolling or actually I think I get you lol but implementable ??

You may also 3bet QJs and JTs maybe even 67s+ and have couple more flushes that you would bet bigger river and maybe turn. I guess he 4bets at least his non suited AK's so lets say he has 4 combos of AK at best and calls with his TT-QQ (15 combos as you have Qs) that should fold out before the river. ATs-AQs and also his AQo (maybe he 4bet bluffs say 2 out of the remaining 8 combos of AQ leaving 6) should call and be folded out too. Since people are always aware of AK being in a 3betting range I'm thinking QJ of spades makes sense for UTG as calling with worse OOP dosen't make sense to me when he can fold a fair bit of his tight range from EP. Having 99 for UTG is also reasonable but some players fold it I believe so say 2 combos of that set and same for 88 IMO. He is repping a tight range. Would he value shove/merge KQs as a bluff OTR. Doubt it he would worry call?
Anyone disagree or add value to that thought process?

Solvers are foldling 22 from even the BTN so I'd say forget it from MP. I think there is some merit to the other ranges you suggested

Note I play 6 max not full ring but would assume full ring people open up 99+ and AJ+ , appreciate solvers may say different, I was shocked to see 50nl rake structure 6 max UTG RFI selections having basically any ace and all suited KX
Working on a supposed full ring UTG open range of AJ+ and 99+ and JTs+ (a touch wider wouldn't suprise but neither a touch tighter )

I just think that he may not be 3betting 50% of JJ vs UTG based on him 3betting AQ. With AQ having blocker effects reducing AA and QQ from 6 combos of each to 3 combos of each and reducing AK from 16 combos to 12 combos I just think AQ is going to be a superior 3bet due to blocking UTG's continue by call or 4bet range where as JJ would make it more likely that UTG doesn't have JJ or JTs and and more likely he has the nuts as far as contiunuing goes if he had such a tiht range to begin with. Maybe If there is a prolific squeezer and UTG fold's to 3bets too much or opens too wide and this is actually knows that JJ as a 3bet may make a lot more sense. I can't see how he knows that with a small sample. It would be kwl to hear if someone thinks I'm missing something or thinks differently or even what a good UTG range is full ring for 100 NL rake structure, that would be ace (pun)

Carroter annoyed me years ago ha Now I follow his content religiously! Looking fresh in this vid too.. Funny how things change . Really like the guy now, love the content and would even be the ideal coach for me at this point. I wouldn't have bet on me typing this 2 years ago. I don't know what to say. Chuffed

Like I read Phil's post about his safe place at college to study poker he was happy there, I'm sorry this video equivalent to a religious converter knocking at the door almost I just don't get why its here :(

I DO NOT PAY ELITE FOR THIS. I know Phil took it at college I had its as half of my Religious Education A Levels in the UK but on run it once, hell no. Hell no WTF.. Sorry u seem cool but not here just no please this is my safe place I can relax u know u get approx. 400K awake hours life time and I just wasted quarter of an hour am I missing something. FU man no knowledge relating to poker FU !

If a donk did this it seems you wouldn't give it a 2nd thought but Sauce does it and here we are.
If sauce can't have sets for cos he did not raise turn and your hand could likely be an overpair with something that bricked then this (have not juiced this pioed it but) may leave sauce with only straights and many bluffs on the river if no sets from no raise turn top two is the next top of his range. You could be a curious overpair unable to often raise bluff basically he is bet folding for value to give him more value bets and when u know that future more bluffs sim spots this is the best I can think of. You can have set and that could happen if its not weighted right as they too many sets I'm wrong but my NLHE days taught ,e 6 combos of pairs only 3 of sets so and many over pairs QQ KK AA none would value bet all may call a bet. Love to know what someone who can add value thinks to that logic (ain't holding my breath old post lol)