Bluffalobill

A very worthwhile initiative that they might very well take into consideration. I'm not sure using the term "table selection" is wise though since it makes our argument sound more self serving than it needs to. When talking about the sustainability of the games it is most convincing if we make the case for all players as well as Poker Stars. Throwing "table selection" in there it suddenly becomes a case of only serving winning players, and I'm not sure Poker Stars will care that much. I think they will think of it like this: Poker Stars profits come first, the player pool as a whole is second in importance and a distant third is winning players. Just my opinion.

Against someone as relentlessly aggressive as Viktor I like a turn and a river call even though it feels dirty and even though he is probably valuebetting extremely thinly here, even JJ. I think he bets close to 100% of his range on the river given stacks and the possibility we are folding a hand like this and/or are on a draw and I think we beat more than 15% of his range which is what we need.
Then again I have never played Viktor and I have calling station tendencies...!

Great thinking processes as always. I must say though, that like many others have commented I also much prefer cash PLO. And preferably more HU stuff. would be awesome with more stuff vs Sauce, for example.

I would prefer less talk when there is no analysis of postflop stuff involved instead of mind numbing preflop stuff like "here I decide to 3-bet", "here I just flat". It is very annoying to listen to and puts my mind to sleep. I would much prefer that you either use the down time between interesting hands to expand on your ideas on your postflop lines or to hand review interesting hands after a session.

I hope you continue the few hands/lengthy discussion format. It's an excellent one and your thought processes come through very clearly.