JimmyGlass

as far as I know/can see there are no subs at all on mastermind

feel free to reach out via PM.
I do play some live, however most of the volume coming from online (3/6 - 10/20). Decent bit of experience in coaching over last 3years.

@21:45 you say 'there is no particular need to Cbet' at 882ss.
It might be too oversimplified view by myself, but don't we have A-high (weak SD at this point) and high expected FE -> thus cbet a default play?

more 5 card content please

14min mark. QQJJT$ds

I get that it's premium but when we 3b vs that shallow of a stack we mostly care about 'cold EQ' and having blockers to 4b range (or let's just say having A is pretty crucial).
we're 48/52 behind vs 20% RFI range, +3 remaining plays can cold 4b (granted, we don't mind too much getting 4b, but still)
* between RFI player and BTN/SB/BB they would have AA ~37,5% of the time.
* obv in 80bb+ slam dunk 3b

anyway, don't you think all of the above mentioned pushes us to actually cc vs shorty here?

Very easy to watch/enjoyable and practical format imo. Would like to see more.
J9 is fairly straight-froward fold w multiple players behind, you only really need ppt to show that.
I wonder about KK from HJ hand (@Q92-2. 3ways). Assuming they don’t bluff raise enough, don’t connect with a deuce much and BU is capped (no Q9+) after flop check, shouldn’t delay Chet be higher EV-line here? We only behind blind’s slowplays and BU’s (rare) AA. Sure, visibility is crap, but we kinda trying to eliminate this factor by betting. Thoughts?

Congrats on plo debut!

28.35 table 2. on the turn - do you think he'll find enough worse hands by the turn to justify calling off?
on the flop we obv in a great shape, his donk range might have all 2 pair+, JT, straights. but when this turn comes we only really chop w T7 and ahead vs JT (that we block; maybe we can sprinkle in some J+KQ no sure), feels like we're dead too often here, no? even at spr 0.6

ty for the video, as always

solid material. might be bit more digestible if you have 2/3 of video as monker+presentation. 1/3 showing your HH related to the topic (where you can discuss how to adjust given stacksizes, tendencies; what mistakes where made and what details to watch out for). Should make video as a whole less dry imo.
thanks for the content

not too related to the topic of the video, but would you say there is any merit in opening for less then a pot in ANTE game? and let's assume opponents are reacting similarly vs x4 and x6.5 (games is 5card PLO)

great video and delivery of material
you've made it mad confusing by switching Vision's bet/check colors in your presentation (smh) :))

@25.10 you didn't comment on top table (turn A77-6ss board).
I think I understand idea of not leading turn(maybe ever on this texture), but when he delays OTT I find a lot of incentives (specifically with our side cards = unblocking draws) to x/R. Is it a mix between x/C and x/R here, would you x/R more often when 100bb effective? maybe you can elaborate on the spot a bit.

@32.03 as well, would like to hear you comment if its standard for you or some kind of deviation. A83cc at AK3-T. do we make a lot of hands with high EQ to fold here? do we try to make better hands to fold as part of reason why we bet? we deny ev by potting, meaning he won't be able to bluff us of better hand OTR when it goes x/x?
any particular reasons why pot>check here?

thanks for the video

thanks for the video.
same format as caller of 3b OOP (COvBU, EPvsCO) I'd find helpful too.

also, if you can do video on 'most effective ways to use vision'.
I'm mostly doing 'steak' thing and finding it pretty effective, but how to get max value from 'practice' mode would be great (I assume something like that might have been released before)

generally like the format.
maybe sticking to specific spot/scenario (leading in SRP or multy-way stabs IP, etc.) would be better

This type of content - (beta) solver + pre analysis is good,
if you'd stop a bit on simple postflop decisions (cbet vs xback decisions, etc) - would be greatly appreciated.
thanks for the video.

Good stuff as always, some eye opening ideas regarding k77-flop hand.
- do you considered KJJ5$ss flat a default (around 9min mark)?
- Think towards the end there was A763$ss SB flat too
My take was that these hands are marginal at best (first has not great playability with players left behind: potentially MW often; and A-suit weak rundown is just too weak and OOP EQ realisation wouldn’t be great) and word is - rake on gg isn’t all that low even at HS.
Cheers

enjoyed video as always.
question: don't you think that we suppose to squeeze way less JJ$ds (and less overall) when BU RFIs solver range, but folds vs 3b/sqz barely ever?
*you've touched on this a bit, but maybe you can elaborate regarding correlation of RFI's strategy vs 3b and our 3b/sqz freq.
thanks

2nd this. +paired boars in SRP, 3b pots

enjoying the series a lot.
learning a lot about icm influence at late stages.
on a side note: please consider making one for early/mid-stages PLO MTTs
thanks

would be interested in seeing similar format but vs weaker fields w\ more comments on deviation from gto.
e.i What blockers we should be looking for to double barrel given opponent doesn't come close to mdf; x-combos are bluffing in equilibrium but we should deviate to passiveness with those when villain in too much of a station, etc. In other words, sprinkling in some exploits (and I guess we need different environment) would be nice. Hope it all makes sense

Liked the debut a lot, looking forward for more.

I don't have access to any solves, but in my book it's frequent bet.
His range is super wide (we open ~30% I guess). We have more K$B$B type of hands, when it comes to KK he prob has some advantage, but it shouldn't decide the situation in favor of not betting (from exploit point of view anyway)
I'd expect field to overfold here, thus bet often (worth Kx -bet; Kx with good side cards should be okay check, bet lots of bluffs with some BD EQ, gutters etc)
Maybe someone else would have more sophisticated thoughts on this spot.

I'd say sqz is borderline, solver might do that frequently - but he is going to face many folds from RFI, we on the other hand - unlikely (I assuming people in 10c\20c don't like to fold pre much), in addition to that you have decent chance to get cc from players left to act.

OOP I'd never squeeze that unless one of villains is shallow and can reopen the action.
Postflop, given spr it's easy pot-call, imo. We should have enough FE+EQ here

Think about how many better flop you gonna get with this hand (I'd say 6JKr is top25% at least),
if you hesitate to gii here with spr ~2, dwhat makes you think squeeze is +EV?

if I got you right, its pot is 10$, villains bets 10$ and is AI. for a breakeven call here we would need 33%, anything above this number would make money in a long run. (mind rake)

$1200 in the pot, V bets $800. 0,8\2,8 = 0.285, so 28,5% EQ vs his range is what you need to breakeven.

vs pot-size bet you need 33% EQ,
vs 1\2 bet you need 25%. you can use this two numbers to approximately estimate what equity do you need to continue.

Given the SPR,
I would say pot-call is +EV (you can make a sim for Shove vs SOR to check it)
benefit of this line - vs reg we make some better hands (QQ,bad KK, maybe some Tx) to fold, as well as some hands w\decent EQ (6xxx, naked Gutter, even though it's hard to have for him gutshot w\ no pair; some T:RR). also, given T-blocker we're unlikely to be in too bad of a shape when have to call off his shove
x\Call is also the line I would examine for sure. Esp. w\bdfd (it add run-outs coverage, visability). I'd say x\call is bit more preferable w\ higher spr.
if you have 1\2 sizing on this board, I'd rather not include this hand into this sub-range

so, it's anonymous games?

you can use PJ's 3way tool to calculate it.
PM me a pre-converted hand (in text) I'll show you how it could be done

very reasonable shove imo, we might make him fold better hands (QQ\KK), and hands w\ EQ (Tx), 56-combos are rare in MP range, but we still have to make sure we dont give this type of hands free cards.
I dont know if xback could be higher EV.
maybe it makes sense to xback this holding to have some dd otr with b\x\ line, vs unknown I wouldn't bother about it too much.

x\call is alright due to the reasons you mentioned, but depending on villain's tendencies - could go for a value bet (vs worse Ax). Also would go bigger otf, not a big deal I guess