Live_your_dreams85

sounds great. however I don,t play at those stakes. totally interested though

yes it does take a really large sample. poker dope is a great tool for helping players understand this. thanks for sharing your graph. that winrate puts you in the 1% of winners for that stake.

cool thanks

yes good point regarding whether AJ is a pure bet for him OTF.

think this is a good question to ask ourselves about the cbetting range construction.

nice winrate. let us know how that winrate continues at 250k hands

I also like to mention that JJ-KK make better calls on the turn when Ax shows up.
as they block AJ-AK which would be his main Ax double barrels.

not sure there is a lot to learn here.
this is not a common situation at these stack depths. Should not make up your winrate really

Did you see my post?

Do you find the pool softer than stars?

How are you studying and how are you with software ?

I was just looking at there Rake structure. 5% up to 4$ at 50 nl

That is kinda annoying. Took a look at GGs rake, and the loss rate is 9-11 bb/100 rake 50 nl (depending on how loose your vpip) So your graph is 14-15bb/100 before that correct? that is still pretty good winrate. even though GG has higher rake the games maybe softer on average. What is your opinion on that?

Even after you import hand histories from the site into your tracker?

not sure why you mention rake? All graphs show profit after rake has been deducted.

So this Graph is with VPIP filtered on correct?
Can you post the graph with blinds and rake added in

thanks for sharing.. If you want to share again at 100k hands please do

looks good solid for that stake

thought I would share my findings
If anyone else would like to post findings please do even from different sites.

PS this is pokerstars sample at those stakes.

I did a data base aggregate report today on the REGS at each stake

50 nl I have 220,657 hands total over last 12 months from today on regs, with the average stats coming in at 25/21/8.6 3bet WWSF 45.3
WTSD 31% W$SD 52%
Average winrate 3.6bb/100

100NL 156,879 same core stats and time frame
winrate 3.1bb/100

that is at reg tables.

Thanks for the response, I currently have a win rate around 3-4bb/100 (I know not very impressive)
I feel like that I should be able to improve on that. I was looking to see if other good regs have better winrates over large samples so that I could a better picture of the average of the population at low stakes.

Reason for the post is to see how efficient the low stakes have become as a whole in a modern climate. Not to shame or have people brag.

pepe I understand your comment and thought process.
However Peter is not much above the winning Regs at this stake with ability( no offence Peter, I learned a lot from your material and books coming up) His input in a few of those spots where he kinda influence cosmos does not add much EV
I think you do have a point with mentioning your problem with this though.

very good point with the Q2 and J7

that is the subrange when we reach on the turn after the X/X line

What Yolan posted looks right..
your loss rate from the BB will be higher in high rake games with good regs

Are any of you working with PLO solvers?

Well said as usual .