Marcus Gray's avatar

Marcus Gray

0 points

Hi Chris, love the videos.
@12:29 you say we should have a turn 1/3 pot size and an all-in size. can you break down further what value and bluff hands you put into 1/3 pot, which you put into all-in, and why for both?

I'm also having trouble deciding which flop FD + SD combo draws we want to check-call and check-raise. generally a hand like AQss here or any other combo-draw works well as a x/r but there are so many here and we need some FDs in our call range, so maybe A8ss and A6ss bc of good showdown (though, they do need protection.) and like A2ss-A5ss, A7ss? Could definitely use input on that bc our flop x/r ranges affect the hands we put into 1/3 pot turn AND turn shove ranges. Not to mention there are a ton of other possible flop raises we can have like the QJ or 79 or 67hh for example...help lol

Oct. 11, 2017 | 8:35 p.m.

Comment | Marcus Gray commented on poker solvers

Can someone shed more light on PIOsolver versus CREV? I bought the GTO solver for CREV and it works well, but since most people are using PIO I feel like there's something I'm missing. What makes PIO better than CREV's GTO solver?

Marcus

Sept. 20, 2017 | 3:39 p.m.

Hi Chris.
@28:30, What are you doing on most brick rivers? I assume having the missed FD is terrible for the 3rd bullet because we block so many of his missed FDs. But I'm also not sure what else we bet 3 times with on this board as a bluff. What are your 3 barrel and 2 barrel/give-up ranges by this river?

Marcus

Sept. 16, 2017 | 6:08 p.m.

Hi Chris,

@13:15 you say he should be betting this turn, but what are you doing on most rivers? If we check river can we call a bet from him and if we bet river what is worse that's calling? This seems to be a tough hand to get three streets of value once that overcard hits.

Aug. 9, 2017 | 3:41 p.m.

Comment | Marcus Gray commented on 78s 3bet pot 10z

Hi Tyler.
Would you mind elaborating or linking me to a video on rake environment for Ignition? I generally construct my preflop call 3bet range (vs complete unknowns) as suited connectors, mid to upper pocket pairs (especially in position) but it would seem this is perhaps a mistake since I'd be playing too many higher variance/high rake hands in more marginal pots at 200nl. Then again, I am also concerned about not breaking the threshhold of MDF... Please help!

Marcus

June 14, 2017 | 2:15 p.m.

@8:50 T7ss on Th 3c 7c, I do like the x/r option for balance, but why do you include flushdraws in your bluffing range rather than something like QJhh or J9hh which have blockers to top pair and backdoor hearts for bluff regulators on turn/river? I've been confused lately on what the better bluff hands are in this kind of spot. similarly, would 89 hands be more in your bluff x/r flop range or your check or x/c range?

March 1, 2017 | 3:30 p.m.

Comment | Marcus Gray commented on Intro to Solver(s)

GTO assumes your opponent is constantly adjusting. Each 'iteration' is an adjustment on their behalf as well as your own. How do we know what part of the "climb" on the mountain to stop? I.E....GTO should rarely be the answer to our play in each hand, correct? Because (except for maybe the top players in the world) no one plays GTO...

March 1, 2017 | 3:10 p.m.

Load more
Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy