This is a situation of depends of wide can 3bet . Him still have some full combos like 88TT$Ds+,44AA and some AsBsQQ,AsCsQQ . i think all of this combos make sense bet small in turn , for bluffs i dont expect much AsAx because deep stack i dont expect much 3bet with AArainbow But always with AA single suited or doble suited So that means him should have to bluff Some AsATT,AsA99 or things like that and this is a low part of him range in comparison with As*s combos and fulls. Im folding here :) .
Oct. 2, 2019 | 2:28 p.m.
Hello, nice series :).
min 43:50 KTA2:KcTc in K2QQ:cc i dont understan why you bet 1/4 turn ¿Its for AA can fold sometimes and dont realize equity when you check ? sorry newbie question :) thanks
Sept. 30, 2019 | 3:57 a.m.
15:00 TA87:ccc 3waypot: ¿Why you use a 1/4 bet here? I think this kind of board in multiway pot with a hand with high equity here is interesting in user bigger sizes or check/raise sometimes? I have doubt about this spots in general :)
Sept. 26, 2019 | 3:11 p.m.
First of all the money are in reales, so we are playing like PLO 150$ :D . The player looks OK reg i think in turn i should bet more bigger. Im think in check but with the Qh + Ts8s Blocker combos is unlikely him bets . In river I think i should bet 75% - 80% Because with the blockers i dont expect much bluffs vs my check , also i expect him can bet smaller sizes with low fulls/Ax to fold , but if i bet I think that hands going to be inhelastic bluffcatchers and i can win more ev .
¿What you think?
Sept. 18, 2019 | 11:25 p.m.
I agree. Before see this post i think in only wrap combos + QQ and even vs this range we have a 45% of equity. Shove:
51 (Stack HEro)
51$+49$ = 110$
51$/110$ = 46,3% Worst hands have to pay to do a Breakeven shove for value
I dont know if the math is fine. But if we put just wraps and QQ we have 45% of equity (That means we are near to do a breakeven shove) https://prnt.sc/p7h8bp also i put 25% that is pretty tight for this guy. But if you put just one combo more worst like AAKT,QJKK,AQK,ect you going to be near to do a ev shove https://prnt.sc/p7h9c6 , if you think the player cant have this type of combos you can pay and in turns A,K,T,9 and 8 (No diamond fold)
Sept. 17, 2019 | 9:55 p.m.
Pretty newbie Question of PPT:
I want Put JT with QQ,98,69,68,KK,A9 , but if i put like this JT(QQ,98,69,68,KK,A9) appear error. I have to put all ranks like this? (JTQQ,JT98,JT69,JTKK,JTA9:hh,JTQ9,JTK9) or i can put other way . Thanks
Sept. 12, 2019 | 4:44 p.m.
Hello: I think all depends of the range you think the villain can have here , if the villain is a bit passive or play wide ranges we can expect more combos like 45K,457,452,ect and you can jam flop expecting him calls with Doubles some Kx+Straight.457 with backdoor flush , ect. I expect a "Normall Player" Dont have much worst x/r/call jam range. I think vs something like this https://prnt.sc/oo7um9 (im working with ppt but i have some doubts) no make sense jam because him dont going to call us with much frequency of 45 combos , so i call and i call jam if the turn no its 7,5,3 or 2 . As played im think is bet pretty small make sense, if you say is a bit spewy maybe make sense because him can bluff sometimes but without info normally i check. River you have to call, if him bet a low frequency of 457 ,45 combos you have a good bluffcatcher,also him can 43*backdoors combos,57backdoors ect . I mean him ratio of bluff is higher and with that price you can call :)
Aug. 4, 2019 | 5:13 p.m.
Im a SNG/spin and go player ago 6 years and now im working in the trasition to PLO. Im coriuos about ¿How does rake affect EV calculations? Above all in microlimits than have a higher rake. Can give me some examples ? really thanks :)