RaSzIk

Great insight Patrick!
I noticed the positive effect of being more aggressive on the turn after flop X/X. Still, I find it hard to define an heuristic for how much more should I bet and for which sizes.

A very hard exploit could be to probe turn entire range for a single 70% size: this has the benefit of simplify the strat and should probably work fine on low stakes vs majority of field.
A more complex approach would be to split your range between two sizes, 30% and overbet, mixing your range between check and bet. That is what I'm trying to implement at NL100, but I'm struggling to set common rules define betting / checking frequencies, resulting in a poor application of the strat..

Would you have some recommendations on how to adjust this?

Thank you, now it's clearer.

Mudkip thanks for the detailed answer. My 3bet range in this spot against std reg is constructed in value hands (88-AA; AJs+; AQo+; QJs+) and bluff hands (Axs; 56s, 67s, 78s, 89s, 9Ts), adding sometimes hands like KTs, Q9s or smaller pairs when villain is more on the tighter side and/or blinds have an high squeeze stat. I don't clearly understand why from a GTO perspective I should check all my range: I mean my range as 67s, 99, 88 with a lower frequency than villain's range, so surely he has a range advantage, but that does not justify a 100% check in this spot with my range.

Why do you think that 89s is not a good 3bet candidate in position against an average tag reg in a deep stack spot?

Hello everyone!
Overall is going pretty well, I'm keeping 8bb/100 after 7k hands.
Below you can find a screenshot with basic stats and the chart

Here's a trycky hand I played tonight.

PokerStars - €0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3 : http://www.holdemmanager.com

Hero (BTN): €17.03 (340.6 bb)
SB: €5.86 (117.2 bb)
BB: €6.87 (137.4 bb)
UTG: €11.43 (228.6 bb)
MP: €11.16 (223.2 bb)
CO: €10.82 (216.4 bb)

SB posts €0.02, BB posts €0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: €0.07) Hero has 8s 9s
2 folds, CO raises to €0.14, Hero raises to €0.45, fold, BB calls €0.40, CO calls €0.31

Flop: (€1.37, 3 players) 5s 9d 8d
BB checks, CO checks, Hero bets €0.91, fold, CO raises to €2.46, Hero raises to €16.58 and is all-in, CO calls €7.91 and is all-in

Turn: (€22.11, 2 players) As

River: (€22.11, 2 players) Th

Results: €22.11 pot (€1.21 rake)
Final Board: 5s 9d 8d As Th

CO shows 6d 7d: (Straight, Ten High)
(Pre 37%, Flop 79%, Turn 70%)

Hero shows 8s 9s: (Two Pair, Nines and Eights)
(Pre 63%, Flop 21%, Turn 30%)

Pre-flop: standard 3-bet IP vs average reg

Flop: this is the tricky point. In game it felt like obvious to jam flop after villain x/raise op. I bet large flop for protection, repping all the overpairs and 88/99.
When he x/raise he surely can have all the TdJd, QdTd, Adxd and the other combos of flushdraw to include as a semi-bluff in his range composed of those combos and all the 55, 88, 99, 67 (I block 88/99)
I feel that at these stackes when average reg does x/raise in this spot (deep stack) he always has it and never bluffs.
In game it seemed the righ choice to jam for protection, but after reviewing I feel like a flat flop should have been the right move, cause at this stakes it's more likely they are super strong when they check/raise this particular deep stack spot.

Any thoughts on the hand?

thanks in advance

Thank you for the tips. I'm aware of the heavy rake at the micros, unfortunately this is the only way I have to climb the stakes.
I will surely dedicate most of the time to implement what I'll learn every day of my poker journey, my first goal is to become better and better at the game and the bankroll increase will be a consequence.

PS: I posted the same thread on the Journal Section, so feel free to follow this there :)

Thank you Mudkip, I've posted it in the journal section (I was not aware about the section).
Surely I will dedicate tons of time to study and share hands!!

GL at the tables