S1lv3rstack3r
0 points
I just had an idea that I think would both allow essential members to see some elite content for a price that they can afford and also give some revenue to RIO that they otherwise would not see.
So I'm an essential member and I've seen a handful of elite videos that I would like to view but since I'm a low/micro grinder shelling out the 99$ isn't practical. If the option to pay for one elite video for 7$ was an option I would probably take it once or twice per month. This would allow me to learn high level content with a bankroll that can't stand 99$ a month and Phil Galfond would make an extra 7$ from each of the many micro and low stakes players on this training site. Would really love to see this!
April 15, 2019 | 8:42 a.m.
Would button check behind the flop with overs? A hi?
April 6, 2016 | 10:06 p.m.
Im looking for people to talk poker with. Play 200nl 6m and 100nl hu. 200nl/500nl live sometimes. Played poker for 7 years, 5 professionally. I have a handful of close poker friends but more would be better. Plz message if interested.
I ran sims on a bankroll growth variance simulator and I took 100 plots of someone with a given winrate and it showed the variance of results over a number of hands that you specify.
What boggled my mind was the difference in results between the "luckiest" xbb/100 player and the unluckiest both who had the same bb/100 winrate. Most results were clustered within 2bb/100 of each other but in some plots there were players who won slightly better than breakeven and others who won 4 - 5x as much. This was plotting over hundreds of thousands of hands. When you plotted over a million there was still variation of about 2bb - 3bb between the plots with noone at some extreme.
This comment is in regards to the idea that everyone who is good banks cash at the same rate as their skill. This idea is not 100% true. There's a high correlation though.
March 20, 2019 | 1:27 a.m.