Scrubx

Nick Steiner will you be able to use keybinds on run it once poker? e.g. keybind "fold" etc

Nick Steiner Ok I see - will RIO have a first deposit bonus? And if yes, how would the math work then? Assume your RB + Deposit bonus would give you a 50% RB - so taking your numbers if you would pay 100€ of rake your net rake paid would be 50€ - so then the streamR program would give you 50% of that aswell - hence you would end up with a total RB of 75€ or in other words 75% in this example.

Or would the deposit bonus be something excluded from this math?

Ty for your fast and helpful reply btw!

Hey Phil Galfond Nick Steiner I love the idea!

Question: Is the RB of this program on top of your normal RB? So let's assume you achieve level1 and your normal RB is let's say at 25% - does your overall RB now equal 50% or 75%?

Hey Phil,

have you thought about making a rerun of e.g. something like Poker After Dark or Highstakes Poker - to promote your site / brand?

You surely know enough elite players that would join, and this could attract a lot of recreationals perhaps? Obviously it might not be easy to get into touch with some television channels that would run the show etc.

Just a random idea.

Phil Galfond the new Messiahs! He will guide us to the promised / glory land!

Will you join joey on a podcast to discuss this?

51:44 the ATcc hand - you are 2.5 buy ins deep - yes you are oop - yes your hand is dominated a decent amount of the time, but doesn't ATs really gain a lot from deeper stack depths? Did you take the stack depth into account while folding or did you overlook it?

Hmm? He didn't minraise flop nor pre, he checked back the flop and 3b small pre - but yeah I see were you are comming from villain will have a pretty strong range raising the turn here.

Yeah pretty much my thoughts here. Being IP would change this spot hugely but going into the river being oop just kinda sucks. A combination that also makes some sense is A3s but yeah it's only 1 combo and its already discounted.

Checking the turn might be better I agree, but if we decide to bet the turn should we follow up on this river in your opinion?

What do you have to support your argument, can you prove that the bluff won't work enough of the time? Why? What range do you give villain? On which points do you disagree? I dont want to sound rude but your argument is pretty thin, I'm all for constructive criticism but it should be well founded.

And the run out is not that much better for villain. I will have 99 here I will have 87 here I will have 89 here. I will have TONS of flushes here, villain seems to be really polarized here in either having a real monster or a marginal holding like JJ.

"Calling this standard would lose you a lot" This doesn't really make sense to me? How does this prove the bluff won't work enough of the time?

"Do you like 3b/f as a default in nl5 zoom?" Yes :) - though vs UTG or MP I sometimes just flat call my ace queens.

Imo I would just get it in on the turn. Yes Villain might have 99 - though would really take this line on the turn with his boat? Meh - he will have quite a lot of flush draws here and other overpairs you dominate so yeah just get it in.

Would size up the turn - lots of spades are possible here. TXss KXss broadway straight draws with 2 spades - I think I would have bet really small and fold when he raises. He def. can have some QX here that might call a 30% bet, a T might get sticky vs a 30% bet. But yeah we cant expect to get tons of value here villain wont have a lot of dominates KX here anymore, since the main ones two paired up on this river obviously.

As mentioned I pretty much doubt he has any straights in his range pretty much - some drooler might have 7s7x some of the time but meh not really that relevant. And yeah I didnt mean to be results oriented I just copyed the whole hand history from HEM and pasted it here :P. But I agree not posting his holding should be better yeah.

And the 4 straight should be a good card for me - not in terms of range but in terms of getting the bluff through aight?

the overbet was to secure fold vs small pocket pairs - since I kinda doubt they would fold for e.g. 60% of pot

ty yeah I see for some reason I thought, that he will fold to the rather small raise.

ok ty for the feedback buddy :) - so either bluff bigger or dont bluff at all right?

yeah I feel you - I def. think he will overfloat the flop since I only bet 30% - but yeah the turn bet should be enough no need to shove the river afterwards since his shit tier hands should already fold ott.

Which combinations of 9X do you give him in a limp calling range on average? And yeah my line looks pretty bluffy thats true, but it shouldnt really matter that much since even a fish will fold the things im targeting otr. Since I already overbet the turn he might not have as many combinations of 88 and stuff as I initially thought, so yeah the river shove might be spewy (though I would still like the turn bet even for overpot).

76hh 98hh 87hh 9Thh QJhh JThh KQhh KJhh QThh KThh K9hh J9hh - sometimes Q9hh T8hh K8hh 97hh - 13-17 combinations - I rarely will barrel the turn with my flush draws - since villain just so often has AX once he calls the flop and I doubt he will fold those pre river. Might have forgotten some combinations but yeah I will have a lot of value raises here.

Well I have an UTG range, I doubt I actually have this many bluffs here right? I normally dont open KJo or QJo from utg (well at some low frequency) I never open JTo or lower from UTG obviously. What bluffs do I actually have here compared to the flushes I have here? Well I have KhQx and QhKx and maybe some KJo QJo combos with one heart. You might be right about the not getting enough folds comment though, if he calls me down with AJo no heart it probably is not working enough against him.

How is it possible to get in touch with you if lets say I would want to share a micro stakes session with you? Or do you just take the session of some students of yourself? - Enjoyed the video - pretty much enjoyed all your videos so far.

my experience at 16NL specifically is, that people are quite crazy pre - but my sample on that stake isent too big (like 10-20k hands) - but yes I agree you dont have to 3bet at a 100% freq

WP imo - you could obviously 3bet pre.

Meh sad folding the river, but I would 3bet pre at a 100% frequency most likely. I would even consider 4-betting over the squeez, he seems to be quite active pre and he won't give you much credit for having a hand after just calling the utg open pre.