awefawes

26:30

I'd probably think we'd want to have two sizes here - One is a big size trying to punish his lack of trips and boats. Second is a small attacking his non FD part of his check/calling range.

I think this hand goes into our big sizing 75-100%. To this range we'd add some As* and few J* for bluffs and for value nutflush+.

For our small sizing I'd go 20-40%. In this range we'd add flushes+ for value. He will be in a difficult spot with his J* and QQ+ and we can follow up river with another small bet if we think hes lacking flushes and hence will fold too much.

However I think this is these type of boards we have to be careful that we aren't being too creative. Since I think a lot of the field isn't balanced and actually have a very strong c/c range that lacks some of the combos (non fd madehands) we'd expect him to fold to our small turn betting range.

Awesome with a HU series Phil. I can't stop thinking about your calldown with A743 at 46:30.

You say that his bluffing range is hands with Kc, Qc, Jc Tc. How often are we checking turn with Thigh flushes and better? - The straight is there so if we go ck turn / bet river we lose value from his straights and if we go ck turn / ck river we lose value from his bluffcatchers on the river.

So to me it looks like a spot where we don't wanna be checking a lot of our flushes. We check some lower flushes to protect our range and a few of our highend flushes (Those with pair and straight blockers). If this is true then it should be better for him to be using a lower club as a bluff and better for us to pick hands with the club that is most frequent in his flushes (perhaps like 9c or Tc?).

Yeah definitely shipping this in. As Pierre points out, his range is wider than that. Also consider this, if his range is narrow here, it's hardly -ev, if however you're wrong, it's a horrendous mistake and you end up betfolding a lot.

@Cory

I assume that your book takes a standpoint in 6m/full ring but the theory can be applied elsewhere (I'm playing HU)?