BaoZi IntRudEr's avatar

BaoZi IntRudEr

7 points

Post | BaoZi IntRudEr posted in Other: Openfacesolutions review?

I'm looking for the oddsoracle/pokerjuice of PLO for OFC/pineapple. I've done some research on this and right now seems to be my only option. I've used their tactic trainer for a little bit and liked it (but i'm new to the game so i'm not entirely sure about the accuracy of their calculations). Has anyone had any real experience with them? Is it worth the money as an educational tool? is there a better choice? Thanks!

Aug. 29, 2015 | 5:06 p.m.

pretty painful situation. not sure what we can do besides calling. however, can't think of a good game plan if we call flop neither. we have low visibilty, a bluff catcher with strong reverse implied odds and a ton of turn cards that we are unsure about. we probably have to call turn on blanks too and hope villain got no balls to bluff river.

March 17, 2013 | 2:44 a.m.

i'll bet 30ish. there's lots of missed draws so vbet top two is very +EV. since there aren't many strong made hands in his range, our bet size doesn't have to be very big imo.

March 17, 2013 | 2:17 a.m.

i think this is a case where having two balanced bet sizes is better than just having one especially when our range here is fair wide. let's say we jam all the naked AA, A9, AKQT stuff and bet small with those hands with fd and with some air. is this a better game plan than just one size?

March 15, 2013 | 2:58 a.m.

are we really cbetting 100% of our range in a 4way pot with SPR less than 2?

March 15, 2013 | 2:48 a.m.

if his range is indeed as tight as (88,77,9tj:ss,78:ss), and we are -EV getting in on the flop, can we consider calling instead of jamming? we have 40% equity against his range and we are getting enough immediate pot odds.

March 15, 2013 | 2:44 a.m.

doesn't this flop make you happy?

March 12, 2013 | 2:46 a.m.

dis dis dis. You are risking too much based on an arbitary sizing tell. You also don't have equity when called. Don't think this will work enough time to make it +EV.

March 12, 2013 | 2:41 a.m.

It's definitely a cbet, but I'm not sure about the getting in part. Having the As makes this a pretty easy cbet, because you can barrel pretty hard on lots of turns and rivers.But against a straightforward opponent, b/f is much better this deep imo.

March 12, 2013 | 2:34 a.m.

Honestly I stopped reading at "straightforward and stationy". Villain like this does not mess with you with a river raise especially on a static board like this.

March 11, 2013 | 9:29 a.m.

Load more uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy