jevonsjiang

On second hand, AA vs JTs, on the river Solver doesn't bet JTs at all, instead it would bluff with some T9s or 88, JT have great showdown value and almost allways get call by better hand, strate mostly.

Hi Darren, Why did you change your RIO name? Getting too famous in real life? LOL
It's a lot of work to run a aggregation report, I guesses that's why this vedio is getting so little feback. Coach sauloCosta10 alos recoment put aggregation report and simple GTO into daily practice, I think it def worth.
I would like to see more of this. And what's in your daily practice pattern.

Great vedio!
I am confuse, if I choose to use a Maximally Exploitative Strategy, and the solver only giving me GTO solusion, how can I develop a exploitative one base on the Solver output?

Great vedio.
I would love to see the next one, and dig deeper when the solver bet high EQ hand, what would he do facing a raise, or miss on the river. Human player like myself are more tend to think: I have some showdown value, I am in position, I can pot control, and if I hit on the river, I can still bet for value, rather than bet the turn and open the action and don't know what to do facing a raise, or built a pot then if don't hit on the river probably loost to opponents calling range, force ourselves to give up or make a big bluff.

Hi Darren~
There is some controdiction between you said: Applications of NLH recommends opening 47.5% form BTN vs BB in a non-ante game. So we definitely have to open wider than that in ante games.
Then you also point out it's a three blind game, so we have to play a little bit tighter, then you give a hand charts of BTN open only 36%.
Kind of a big gap between 47.5% and 36% don't you think?

You make it clear that playing too tight is bleeding money in ante-game, but since opponents tend to over call open, it's difficult to play a wide range in a muti-way pot even IP.
And do you think that since opponents are more likely to over call in their blinds when you call EP in MP or BTN, should we adjust to 3-bet isolate more with a wider range, rather than just call and play a muti-way pot with hands like JJ KJs？

In the other video "R", you tall about Equity Realization, Here in this one, Straddle calling 51.43% vs BTN's 36% RFI range, I don't think straddle can realize it's equity very well since it doesn't have range advantage or position, even with the great pot odds. And people tend to open biger like 4x these days.

Hope you lay out more though about this, I would love to see you making another vedio talk about range building, expcially those that you didn't cover in this one, like EP facing 3-bet, BTN/SB vs HJ/EP open and so on.

Thanks！

Second time I watch this video, So I should praise myself twice:)
Thank you for sharing these idea, it's so much harder get jobs done than knowing what to do. But one step at a time, on area at a time. I am WORTH IT.

Should we concern about "won without showdown", since I play straddle games, the red line goes down prety steady, when I try to be more aggressive, that would just hurt my win rate because most of the opponents didn't fold their hand to your bluff.

Nice vedio as always!
Some people love to limp raise from EP with nuted hands to avoid muti-way pot, is this a profitable paly? I think it would cap our open range from EP. And short stake limp-jamp gonna get call a lot, so small pairs are too week I agree.
I am wondering is this the way to train ourself into range thinking by using sofeware to run a sepecific hand, so we can understand little by little, until we get used to analysis hands in this way.

very nice!
Against a lot of short stake in the game, should we still open small poket pairs or calling, trying to hit a set, I remenber one of the rule is that we need our opponent have more than 15 times of our calling size to justify this kind of action. And getting 3-bet from short stake we are almost always folding our small pairs, right?

Great vedio!~ I was wondering, on straddle games such as 248, what if most of the opponents just buy in 400 chips, in my point of view, it's just 50bb at most, that makes our full stake become meaningless. My questions are:
What's your main adjustment in this situation？
Should I learn how to play short stake skill for this? Hands like AQ, KQ, 77 got 4bet mostly fold in 100bb stake size, should we be more willing to get it in preflop, and so on..
By the way, Thanks for your reply on the question should we buy in deep stake to play, it helps a lot.

Great videos! Looking forward to see more.
My quessiong is in these games, without limitation of how much you buy in, should we buy in more then 100bb to cover other plays to play a deep stack game, such as when we got bad beat and our oppent have 250bb, should we buy in 250bb to play against with?

Waiiiiiiiting for new video.

Can he value raise me with a wores hand like two pair or lower sets? K2, T2 are less likely to call my preflop 3-bet, Poket 99 or 44 are less likely can call on the flop. And there are 22, TT, KT, totally 9 combos, I also think these hands probably will re-raise the flop or turn.

9 combos of 22, TT, KT probably re-raise on the flop or turn, and not always re-raise against river small bet, and KT he also very unlikly to have since we have KK, let ‘s totally count 5 combos in villain’s range.

What are the drawing hands can call me on the flop and turn on this board texture? 16 combos of QJ, hands with gutshot and back door flush draw like AQ♣, AJ♣, Q9♣,J9♣, and I had the K♣, so one pair back door flush draw will be TX♣ like AT♣, QT♣, JT♣, T9♣, T8♣, T7♣,T6♣, totally 27 combos.

QJs, AQ♣, AJ♣, AT♣, QT♣, JT♣,T9♣ probably open-raise preflop, let’s cut half of the suit combos out of villain’s range, it would be 5 combos.

2 combos of QJs and 12 combos of QJo, 14 combos of value raising hands that beat me. 5 combos of value raising hands that are worst than me. And 8 combos of bust drawing hands that didn’t open-raise preflop.

Let’s say it’s an unknow villian, no knowing his bluffing frequency, open range, or post-flop re-raise range or frequency what so ever. If the range I assume is reasionable, on the river, let’s say he would re-raise all 14 combos of QJ, and 3 combos of two pair or set type of hands, and 4 combos of the busted draw hands. In this way, 7/21(33%) of his re-raise range would be worse than mine.

I think my river bet size is aiming for thin value and also kind of want to blocking villain’ bluff, but sometimes villain will take it as weekness and on the contrary induce him to bluff.

Also, after my river bet, the pot is ￥1092, and I got ￥939 left, isn’t he shove all in better than raise 2/3 pot if he got the nuts.

I have to call ￥555 to win ￥2375，if his range contain more than 23.37% of weeker hands, than I should call.

I hope I break it down reasionable, and look forward to your further comments.belrio42 hnsmht akissv7

Stack sizes are carrect, with ante it's not that deep as it looks like, just as the hand played out, if we r 100bb, in this type of game, chips already go all in on the turn.So you can take it as I have > 200 big blinds, and UTG+1 has > 400 big blinds.

About the flop bet sizing, Just like akissv7 said, on the general tendencies they are call happy one, so I can bet as big as I can and exploit it, I think if I make a pot size bet here villain also gonna call if he can call a 2/3pot size bet.

I prefer not to make big bluffs on this level of game, too many calling station will call you down with top pair week kicker or one pair with a back door draw and things like that. I think I play my hand almost face up, representing AK+, and I also don't think there is too many busted draw combo in my range as I 3-bet preflop from the SB. As the pot already have 200bb, I think Villain have very few hands that can call my big river bet, set T or 2 or KT may just raise me on the flop or turn, on the river T9 two pair is the one.

It worked both way, accepting a higher variance or playing overly tight. The thing with playing overly tight is too many caller to out draw your over pair and TPTK, and these player don't like fold draw ether, you have to prepare put 100bb into the pot when you just have one big pair, because your opponent will gamble all his chips with a draing hand, offcause also with his two pair or set. On the other hand it feels like the ante and blinds are eaten you up very fast if you don't actively engage. I tend to play a little big loose pre-flop, and keep in mind don't over play my hand after flop.