quik

Yeah I agree with your concerns. But either I play GTO vs a really good opponent here and bet big, or I bet 1/2 pot vs a weaker opponent as an exploit, and then I don't care that much that my value range is really narrow. Also in an anonymous pool, it's even less of a concern to be unbalanced in this spot as I don't think the average player would call often enough with Khi in this spot. Also I usually don't check down bottom of my range out of principle unless I have a really strong read.

Ts7s Hand: I would typically bluff this river for around half pot. I think you are right, that most people don't bet many Ax on the river OOP. But the line seems pretty weak to me on the river. People might find the overbet with AK/AJ on the turn, but usually nothing weaker. (This is mostly based on mid stakes live games). On the other hand, they tend to overbluff this overbet sizing on the turn, as they just don't have enough value. I would never bluff KJ on this river, as I expect to win a ton, occasionally losing to some slowplays or AK/AJ.
And I think a bet for around half pot gets him to fold KJ, KT,JT,T9, J9 and higher spades which is quite a ton. I wouldn't go to small so that he doesn't get curious with Khi.

Great video idea, unfortunately the sound quality is quite bad and its hard to understand you. Also maybe next time only play one table, as it is quite confusing to follow and I don't see any advantage to 2 tables.

Great! Please more from this!!

the A5o hand felt like population would barrel QT pure. I saw in the soloution A2o is used as a 3bet river shove as a bluff. I Think population has J9 all day there, i would either overfold or shove these indifferent catchers.
Because i strongly believe the spot is played incorrectly - Range unprotected and not enough bluffs.
It becomes a question of: if he overcalls vs 3bet jam with the two pair combos he has.

He is "thinking" aka taking time with 99 on the straight board isn't equal to him having a higher folding freq with that combo.
You shouldn't overly emphasise on that "tell"

min 4 you pointed out that in 5card you split about even between flatting and 3betting in the SB according to solver and you implied this is different from 4card. But Vision plays about the same strat in the SB. flatting 8%, 3betting 9%.

Can you comment on 110bb 120bb 130bb or where is the cut off in terms of deepness for this strategie beeing viable?

BBvsBTN A88
People who are C-betting Range there are quite common.
I think they 3bet more linear than the GTO Range and tighter than 14%.

The 100% Cbet small simplifcation would make sense for them with these changes to their Preflop Range.

Could you explore how you would capture their EV LOSS in other Nodes & where the downfall of this faulty Preflop Strategy lies.

You are providing quality content with a lot of prep work going into your videos.
Some of the Elite Coaches don't do that - I feel like RIO isn't fair in that way to you. You clearly deserve Elite status.
Thank you for the great Q7 vs 54 example.

vs 2.5x BB Z500 Rake T5s & and; A7o are defends

If you re not here to share your unique strategy - are you here to just share whatever has been shared already?

what is the reason you aren't using presolved GTO ranges for your preflop inputs?

at 09:05 you b/f the NFD BvB. Seems quite tight to me? And wouldnt it be better to just x/c this hand with 3 overcards?

Your method of learning is very practical. But how come you aren't using GTO preflop ranges to analyze your spots?

Following up on the preflop ranges.
Any sources you can provide where to purchase or get further informations on monker solver ranges?
Im in a similar situation where I think my own created solutions are not accurate enough and the competiton becomes just better and better.

The video is like 30min too long...

practical approach. human-esk, i like it

U read the sizeings wrong on the turn in the PIO Hand:

"the block" was actually 14 into 21
and the "big" was shove 92 into 21

-> so 80% fold vs shove 92 into 21 makes actually sense

first hand: Since you said that a lot of live players will be cbetting this board too much, it would have been interesting how your strategy would change if that assumption was the case. In the PIO Sim you just took a look at the PIO line (checking 100% OOP)

Come on man, a new mic shouldnt be that expensive!

In the last hand aren't you not taking into account that you are going equity on the turn? If he is 3 betting 2%, AA and KKds you have about 14% equity. And you only need 19%. You only would be saving the full 1950 if you had 0%. But you would also have to take into account that you could get the 1950 in with a significant equity advantage on the flop. Or is my thinking flawed?