bluffing in a b/b/b line vs a nitfish

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

bluffing in a b/b/b line vs a nitfish

Blinds: $0.10/$0.25 (7 Players) MP: $25.00
CO: $21.20
BN: $25.00 (Hero)
SB: $25.10
BB: $25.00
UTG: $29.67
UTG+1: $17.27
25/6 101
Preflop ($0.35) Hero is BN with 5 6
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $0.25, 2 folds, Hero raises to $1.00, 2 folds, UTG+1 calls $0.75
Flop ($2.35) Q 4 A
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $0.74, UTG+1 calls $0.74
Turn ($3.83) Q 4 A 2
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $2.75, UTG+1 calls $2.75
River ($9.33) Q 4 A 2 9
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $20.51 and is all in
12.78$ left.
Throwing balance out of the window for now: We need to fold out some Ax in order to have a +ev bluff (A3s and A5s).

K,Q,J,T,4,2 are the worst rivers in terms of fold equity. Those I wouldnt fire even if this combo is the bottom of my range. Other river cards are interesting, we need to fold out few of his Ax. In theory, its a pure bet I guess, but my question is: are you interested in testing his weaker Ax?

My intuition says, yes, on rivers like this, I like to bet vs this player profile. We are repping really strong and once we see a light call down by him, we can switch to full explo strategy (literally without river bluffs). However, by then I think its a bit assumptive to play with almost zero bluffs. Especially on this runout where QQ,AA,AQ are usually raised pre by him and other twopairs+ might potentially fastplay

Loading 12 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy