Could I get more value here? Studying my small pots: BTN VS BB SRP. 10NL 6 Max on Ignition / Bovada
Posted by PoeticEconomist
Posted by PoeticEconomist posted in Low Stakes
Could I get more value here? Studying my small pots: BTN VS BB SRP. 10NL 6 Max on Ignition / Bovada
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (5 Players)
BN: $10.00 (Hero)
SB: $10.05
BB: $10.56
UTG: $9.60
CO: $6.99
SB: $10.05
BB: $10.56
UTG: $9.60
CO: $6.99
SB is an unknown player.
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is BN with
A
5
, , ,
Since Villain cold called from the SB, I think, in this pool, that it's likely he is one of the weak players with the tendencies: High VPIP / Sticky / Passive.
Flop
($0.60)
5
3
K
, ,
Taking a look in Power-Equilab, I'm conflicted between betting medium size or large on the flop for value with a strong hand like this (mid pair+nut flush draw), or c-betting small simply because I'm in position against a capped range. The idea behind sizing up to my 75%, is it would be a good exploit against the pool where players tend to be sticky.
Turn
($1.16)
5
3
K
6
, ,
Here I'm slightly concerned about who has the nut advantage, as villain likely has 74s that he could have called from the SB. I think that he has the nut advantage, do I have this right?
River
($2.62)
5
3
K
6
8
,
I'm pretty sure it's too thin to bet here. 3x may fold, and I may just be value betting myself when he calls with 6x, 8x, or the pocket pairs such as 77 or 99.
Final Pot
BN wins $2.49
Rake is $0.13
Rake is $0.13
My question is if I could bet more on flop and turn for value given pool tendencies to call loose postflop, and be sticky. Furthermore, since recreationals are passive post-flop at this stake, I can be less concerned that I will be x-raised and be blown off my equity (~75% on the flop with medium made hand + nutFD against his range).
Let me know your thoughts, I have my ranges and data from power-equilab for the flop below.
1st image is the range BTN RFIs
2nd image shows that middle pair + Nut flush (As5s) draw has 75% equity against SBs range
3rd image shows SB's range categorized on Flop. It's interesting to see that we don't have a range advantage against SB on this flop (50.23% VS 49.77%
Loading 10 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.