ianks

cardrunenrs EV on a mac?

and d) you have decent equity if called

On the K4ss hand, I think c/r the turn is the best line for a few reasons: 1) that turn card hits his perceived range quite hard 2) he has a lot of floats on the flop 3) his turn sizing will typically make it so you have more fold equity on c/r. you stand to win a decent pot if you c/r, and he has to fold a large portion of his range there.

play NL100 mainly when i have time

as for a counter argument, i think your range is so face up on the river (i.e. you should be barreling that A with both your bluffs and value) that you may have to call here. he should know this, and that A on turn is a decent barelling card for him, and second A makes it less likely he has it. on top of that, it we fold KK here do we even have a calling range? i guess we could check some A2-A4s bluffs to check/call here.

On hand1 with TT, do you not inductively reason that this guy may be a fish because of his min-3 and 4-bets. Given that, I would assume his range is far more weighted to QQ+ than you might be assuming. I could almost justify folding TT here, although its cringe-worthy.

are you the type balance fingerprints as well?

logarithms tho

recursively scrape all of GameTheory's post data, compare sentence similarity with Ike. bam.

i would def consider folding QTs UTG here. often, hands that will flat IP against you are hands that have you crushed (QK, AQ, etc). if you do get called, you are playing OOP, which is not optimal with our (often-drawing) hand. 

i did some rough calculations, and i think you have to jam here. even if you only get fold around 10-15% of the time, you lose less than you would folding. also, given that your range hits this board much harder, they will make some mistakes by folding hands with decent equity (7xxx type hands they somehow show up with, for example).

eww that's one nasty flop for our range and a beautiful flop for his. 

with a more passive opponent, I think bet small fold is our best line. we win a lot of pots this way and he can tell us when were beat

against a spazzier type I would prob bet enough like $140ish and call shove. don't really know how I feel about that though.

against a good well balanced player I would prob check this back, and make sure I have some straights to check back on this flop so our flop check back range here isn't exploitable

think you played it well. although I think your turn bet could possibly be a touch smaller like you said so you can fold to shove. but I think that depends on how likely he is to be a calling station here. if he is, then better more for value is better imo

I would adjust my sizing based on how nitty or loose the opponent is. for uber nits I go really small, maybe like $17. for loose/stations I might go $25. raising for value, looking to get tilt called. not too worried about having a bluff range on this particular board, because I know players at this level will often infer I will bluff here due to my behavior on other boards.

how do you guys feel about XR here? if he checks back we have some nice straightening cards, and we have some fold equity on flop (although minimal). or is this just bad in general?

I'm game. How should we start?

Q7xx

is anyone actually organizing this? no invite yet... sn: i.kerseymer

skype: i.kerseymer

what do you guys this about his flop sizing? dont you think it would be better to bet smaller with a more polarized range here and bigger with medium hands?