100zoom - OOP as 3ber pre, 3barrel too thin?
Posted by julien808
Posted by
julien808
posted in
Low Stakes
100zoom - OOP as 3ber pre, 3barrel too thin?
Blinds: $0.50/$1.00 (6 Players)
BN: $174.64
SB: $59.52
BB: $130.46 (Hero)
UTG: $98.50
MP: $92.40
CO: $29.23
SB: $59.52
BB: $130.46 (Hero)
UTG: $98.50
MP: $92.40
CO: $29.23
Preflop
($1.50)
Hero is BB with
A
Q
, , , ,
Flop
($19.06)
K
K
A
,
Turn
($37.98)
K
K
A
J
,
River
($82.94)
K
K
A
J
9
,
Vilain infos :
- open 52% bu, in these pos fold3b 42% (19occ)
- overall fold/call 3b 52/39
- F vs cbet flop/turn 26(39)/25(16) (as 3bcaller ip)
I thought i was gonna have tons off 3barrel bluffs on that board,
And given that i have blockers on QK and QT, i would include AQ in my value range.
in a exploitative point of view, seems like vilain wouldnt call Ax x<J, since his wtsd is 26% (8kh)
But his fold to cbet per streets as caller ip is pretty low ( 38/47/29(7) )
So i wasnt certain at all about his capacity to fold Ax there, and shoved.
Thoughts ? Thanks in advance.
- open 52% bu, in these pos fold3b 42% (19occ)
- overall fold/call 3b 52/39
- F vs cbet flop/turn 26(39)/25(16) (as 3bcaller ip)
I thought i was gonna have tons off 3barrel bluffs on that board,
And given that i have blockers on QK and QT, i would include AQ in my value range.
in a exploitative point of view, seems like vilain wouldnt call Ax x<J, since his wtsd is 26% (8kh)
But his fold to cbet per streets as caller ip is pretty low ( 38/47/29(7) )
So i wasnt certain at all about his capacity to fold Ax there, and shoved.
Thoughts ? Thanks in advance.
Loading 5 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.