NL50 Bottom set vs a nit/passive reg
Posted by Limp Limpson
Posted by
Limp Limpson
posted in
Low Stakes
NL50 Bottom set vs a nit/passive reg
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (6 Players)
BN: $53.36
SB: $51.58 (Hero)
BB: $52.78
UTG: $46.12
MP: $73.54
CO: $50.25
SB: $51.58 (Hero)
BB: $52.78
UTG: $46.12
MP: $73.54
CO: $50.25
villain is 23/17 over 2k hands. Cbet F in non3bp 43%, WTSD 39%(!), doesnt fold to xR or donkbets much..overall just doesnt fold much. AF F/T/R 2/1/1. Raise T cbet 1/10, raise F donkbet 2/10, raise F cbet (not sure if relevant) 11/61, fold to donk flop 4/10. Note that he likes to bluffcatch in bad spots.
Preflop
($0.75)
Hero is SB with
2
2
, , , , ,
Flop
($4.00)
A
2
6
, , ,
Decided to lead, since OR doesnt cbet too much, xR looks strong even vs stations and I think this is a decent spot to lead hands like 45ss/hh/cc etc.
Turn
($9.50)
A
2
6
6
, ,
Is this a fold? This is not a villain who is likely to bluff I think.
otr we have 30.83$ behind into a pot of 43.5$. Assuming brick rivers, do we xF? donkjam? xC?
thanks guys
Loading 4 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.