I am very new to the use of solvers. My main question is pertaining to overbets. It seems as though in spots where we have say nfd and are faced with a 120% overbet that solvers tend to lean towards folding. Obviously this is optimal as if we go around calling all overbets we will go broke. However what happens when we have a villian that knows this and frequently overbets as a bluff. It's impossible for a solver to take dynamic into account. Or am I wrong and solvers should be the final judgment in all cases?