Out Now
×

Why does "good for your range" mean you should bet more often / larger? I have heard this concept countless times both in relation to NLHE and PLO.

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

Why does "good for your range" mean you should bet more often / larger? I have heard this concept countless times both in relation to NLHE and PLO.

What I do think I understand:
1) This is GTO and ignoring exploits from reads .
2) When you don't have the strong portion of your range, it tells you when you can convincingly " rep" a hand.

What I do not understand

1) Why should you bet larger with all your actual holdings? In other words, why is the money you gain from bluffing in these spots not offset by the amount of value you miss-out on when you have a value hand?
2) Why should you consider leading on flops that are good for you--same considerations as last question)?

Thanks for any help on this!

Loading 5 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy