# 100z confused about range interactions here

Blinds: \$0.50/\$1.00 (6 Players) BN: \$108.00 (Hero)
SB: \$107.81
BB: \$36.93
UTG: \$366.82
MP: \$100.00
CO: \$100.30
Preflop (\$1.50) Hero is BN with T 9
UTG raises to \$2.50, 2 folds, Hero calls \$2.50, SB raises to \$12.00, BB folds, UTG folds, Hero calls \$9.50
Mixing here pre vs utg. Not sure how to react vs the squeeze, villain was loose reg so I called.
Flop (\$27.50) 4 T 9
SB bets \$7.00, Hero raises to \$18.00, SB calls \$11.00
Against his tiny bet I thought this combo would like to raise
Turn (\$63.50) 4 T 9 9
SB checks, Hero bets \$25.50, SB raises to \$77.81 and is all in, Hero calls \$52.31
Interesting card, since it blocks all my value hands. I bet about geometric.
Final Pot BN wins and shows a full house, Nines full of Tens|a full house, Nines full of Tens.
SB lost and shows a pair of Nines|a pair of Nines.
BN wins \$216.62
Rake is \$2.50

On flop, while my raise seems like it should be fine against his wide range, when I pio'd it, it had me raising practically 0% after forcing him to bet his range for 25%. His range was TT+ AQo+ ATs+ then about 40% of suited BW, AJo and KQo, and some suited Ax. Why wouldn't I have raises here? Both equities and evs were pretty close to 50.

Then the turn. So this turn card decimates my value range, i believe i go from about 9 combos of possible nutted value to 5 (excluding 4s). So how does that affect my betting and sizing? I thought maybe having less value combos, I should bet big and polarize between nuts and air. Pio disagrees and chooses 35% pot, with no bigger bets. My exact combo betting about 50% of the time.