46/3 39
based on this, I am more inclined to say that he is rather a passive fish.

vs a more passive guy, I think I am more incentivized to cbet and build up the pot.. dont expect too many stabs, therefore my x/r plan is gonna be less effective.

Playing hand vs range strategy vs seemingly weaker player. Lot of pair+draw type of hands which I wanna charge.

9x is calling inelastically, maybe even Tx and flushes as well. 7x and worse might fold to any sizing. By betting smaller, I think I kinda have to call to a raise - he could be thin vbetting weaker flush or trips. But now, I doubt that he is ever value betting worse. On the other hand, he doesnt have that many better combos. 8d6d,55 and slowplayed TT,T9s,77? Not sure about this, but this type of player is capable of checking back those type of hands OTF imo. Only possible bluff which come to my mind is QdJx, but thats only 3combos if so. I need to be right 33% of the time. So vs a range 55,8d6d, TT = 7 combos, I need to find at least 4 bluff combos and imo assigning him all QdJx is already a bit assumptive.

Maybe incorrect value betting with KdQd, KdTd? Seems assumptive again, esp vs my overbet