Was my 75% c-bet fine, or too low for this wet flop?

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

Was my 75% c-bet fine, or too low for this wet flop?

This is my first thread, so thanks in advance for your review. BTW - any idea how to enter hand history for review from GGpoker? Hand history converter does not seem to work here at RIO for GGpoker

Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (6 Players)
SB: $74.09 (Hero)
BB: $33.59
UTG: $50.34
MP: $34.99
CO: $66.93 Villain [tight aggressive reg]**
BN: $41.76
Preflop
($0.75) Hero is SB with [Kd As]]
CO raises 1.85, Hero 3bet 5.88, CO calls 4.03

Flopp
($12.76) [3h Kh Qd]]
Hero bets $9.57, CO calls $9.57

Turnn
($31.90) [3h Kh Qd 2c]]
Hero bets $23.93, CO calls $23.93

Riverr
($79.76) [3h Kh Qd 2c Td]]
Hero bets $35.56 (all-in), CO calls $27.55

CO shows [9h Jh]]
CO wins $134.86

As a 3better I felt like having advantage with this flop, but still it was quite wet, so decided to c-bet 75% of the pot, to prevent Villain draws - I think that within his range, there is only one combo beating me (KQ) as QQ/KK would be 4bet, while 33 is rather fold for him.
Shall I bet more to make him his calling non profitable, or was my bet size fine? Was he fine to call considering he had 12 outs (flush draw + gutter)?

I might have checked river, but I guess he would bet anyway - [Td] was a good card to make a bluff at the river, so my bet was to prevent him potentially bluffing and making me wonder if I shall call with my bluff catcher [Kd].
I knew he was drawing, but considering that [Td] was a good card only for gutter, I felt like this was a good decision to go all-in OTR.

Loading 2 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy