In this hand JayP-AA back-raise click back 4bets AA and M.O.P chooses to call the 4bet rather than 5bet jam and allow JayP-AA to 6bet all-in if Oddsen were to call. One of the main benefits of shortstacking PLO is that you're deeper stacked opponents can force each other off their equity creating an overlay/dead money while you're already all-in. Why did M.O.P. choose not to use this concept in this hand? Is it possible that his particular hand benefits more from allowing Oddsen to see the flop rather than force him off his equity? M.O.P. could have a hand that severely dominates Oddsen's range or perhaps M.O.P.'s hand has similar equity vs AA and vs AA and another hand. What kinds of hands fall into those categories? I say all this with the assumption that M.O.P. is almost never folding a flop given the price his is laid with .16 SPR.

On a side note, what hands are good enough for Oddsen to call the 6bet and 328k 7bet from JayP-AA?

PokerStars, Omaha Pot Limit - $100/$200 - 3 players
Rail Hand History Converter

Odd_Oddsen (BU): $36934.95 (185 bb)
JayP-AA (SB): $43672.74 (218 bb)
M.O.P. (BB): $8200 (41 bb)

Pre Flop: ($300)
OddOddsen (BU) raises to $700, JayP-AA (SB) calls $600, M.O.P. (BB) 3-bets to $2800, OddOddsen (BU) calls $2100, JayP-AA (SB) 4-bets to $5500, M.O.P. (BB) calls $2700, Odd_Oddsen (BU) calls $2700

Flop: ($16500) A A 2 (3 players)
JayP-AA (SB) bets $3200, M.O.P. (BB) calls $2700 (all-in), 1 fold

First Turn: ($21900) 5 (2 players, 1 all-in)

First River: ($21900) 4 (2 players, 1 all-in)

Second Turn: ($21900) 9 (2 players, 1 all-in)

Second River: ($21900) 3 (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $21900 (Rake: $5)

First Showdown: Board: A A 2 5 4

JayP-AA (SB) shows T Q A A (four of a kind, Aces)
M.O.P. (BB) mucks
JayP-AA (SB) wins $10947.50

Second Showdown: Board: A A 2 9 3

JayP-AA (SB) shows T Q A A (four of a kind, Aces)
M.O.P. (BB) mucks
JayP-AA (SB) wins $10947.50