GrandpaJoe
1 points
Hey Onkleb, really enjoy the thread, had a couple of questions
1. How would you recommend structuring MDA study step by step?
2. Who are the best 500z regs youve played with? (Obv sample will distort perception but still fun to get some names :D)
gl keep up the good work!
April 26, 2020 | 12:42 a.m.
Not considering exploitative adjustments in poker is extremely counter productive and misleading
This is actually one of the main reasons why I did this. Are we not playing exploitatively by checking our entire range on some boards? Of course, it would be a big mistake on a lot of boards.
I agree with a lot of what you said, but if we can make our life a hell of a lot easier by checking range, and villain doesnt adjust accordingly, we might gain EV by implementing this strategy and knowing this tree better than our opponent. For the record, I am just talking about boards such as 662s, 532s etc where we are already checking 70%+ at equilibrium
Feb. 21, 2019 | 8:58 p.m.
Hey guys,
Im looking for opinions on how much EV we are willing to sacrifice in terms of bb/100 in order to simplify our strategy. For example, I ran a few scripts in PIO for blind vs blind srp, one where we can cbet two sizings as the sb, and one where we check our entire range. I then began comparing the EV loss between the two strategies on different boards, and I was quite lost when it comes to identifying a threshold for when implementing a pure check strategy becomes worth it with regards to the lack of EV we gain from implementing the more complicated mixed strategy.
Here is a look at how big/small the EV difference looks on some boards in bb/100
Sick results congrats, any chance of a YTD graph?
April 27, 2020 | 10:19 a.m.