MB

This might make you feel better. 

Would love to see the same format, but calling 3 Bets OOP. 

Like the video, but it might help to record more of the screen, even if you're only two tabling, so you can have your replayer up and not be missing the ongoing action.

Enjoyed this, and I like the sounds of the upcoming videos. I would really like to see you focus on OOP CB options in both 3B and single raise pots. 

I've also had a couple sessions with John, he was good. With a few pointers I went from breaking even at 50 PLO to beating 200 PLO.

Like the live zoom vids! 2 tables and more in depth strategy talk would probably be better though. 

With WSOP fast approaching I'd love to see some concept or HH review of live full ring PLO, and the adjustments needed in these games coming from an online background. 

I thought the 4 tabling format was good. It's a bit slower, but you can fill the spare time with different examples of how you would play similar spots if some of the variables were different. For example, if stacks were deeper/shallower, if your hand was slightly stronger/weaker. 

I find I always got the most out of coaches who would do these different scenarios. It's like seeing you play several similar hands at once. 

"If you know they fold a lot in 3B pots and/or rarely check-raise (which weakens their checking ranges and makes it easy to respond once the c/r comes), that's more reason to bet-fold. If they peel a lot and stack off light, that's more reason to bet-call. If they don't fold too much and you're unsure about how to respond to a c/r, that's more reason to check and play turns. "

This seems like a great plan, Thanks for the response.

A theory topic that I think would be interesting is c/r flops as the PFR when SPR is deeper than just c/jam. I don't think most small/ mid stakes players have a wide enough flop c/r range, which obv allows their opponents to play very well against them IP.

I've read every article on his blog, and think they're all fantastic. I would love to see some theory videos by him too.

I've been thinking about this spot a lot today, but more from the other perspective. As the IP player facing the CB, how do you split your range (raising/floating) to take advantage of a high CB%, and what sizings do you use for a raise? I feel like this is a spot where we can get away with raising quite small, maybe even min at 100BB.

I use C also. What do you guys think about isolating smaller in later positions vs limpers who are shorter than 100BB? I can see arguments for potting and raising smaller, essentially the same arguments used for an exponential open size.