I might be mistaken, but subtracting only the 16 mincashes in the ITM PP doesn't seem correct to me. I think we need to substract the mincash for all cashes in the same way we had to do that for the 16 mincashes to avoid counting them double. It seems like you account for the mincash for players 1-39 double since you give them their mincash-dollars twice, first as part of the ITM PP (G) in column B and second as mincash ev in column C.
Again might very well be a fallacy on my side, would appreciate it if someone can point out what fallacy I make then
Jan. 8, 2017 | 1:44 a.m.
Load more
TRAIN WITH THE BEST
Learn from the Run It Once Pro Team with two new instructional videos every day.
I might be mistaken, but subtracting only the 16 mincashes in the ITM PP doesn't seem correct to me. I think we need to substract the mincash for all cashes in the same way we had to do that for the 16 mincashes to avoid counting them double. It seems like you account for the mincash for players 1-39 double since you give them their mincash-dollars twice, first as part of the ITM PP (G) in column B and second as mincash ev in column C.
Again might very well be a fallacy on my side, would appreciate it if someone can point out what fallacy I make then
Jan. 8, 2017 | 1:44 a.m.