John Doe
0 points
http://www.pokerhand.org/?6516600
Pre-flop: We flat IP with the NFD and kings. If the dangler was a T+ or suited I think a squeeze would be a good play.
Flop: Villain bets 9 into 12 and gets a call. Since he did not bet pot I think his holdings are: Two-pair+add-on, second nut straight, nut straight but not with a very weak/non-existent add-on, set, pair+good flushdraw.
Vs this range we have about 50% (QQAT,QQAK,QQJT,AQTT,AJQ9,AJQT,Jh9h87,JhTh98,AhQTh8)
Furthermore I think he may bet/fold some of his range, maybe a naked AJ89 and a hand such as TT88.
The one who calls will probably have a weaker range but which may include a naked AJ. Because of his lesser stack I think that scenario is pretty rare though.
Thoughts about potting the flop and repping AJ+add-on when we in reality have 50% equity vs his get-in range. Vs AJxx we have 44% equity. And what if Villain pots the flop?
Pre-flop: We flat IP with the NFD and kings. If the dangler was a T+ or suited I think a squeeze would be a good play.
Flop: Villain bets 9 into 12 and gets a call. Since he did not bet pot I think his holdings are: Two-pair+add-on, second nut straight, nut straight but not with a very weak/non-existent add-on, set, pair+good flushdraw.
Vs this range we have about 50% (QQAT,QQAK,QQJT,AQTT,AJQ9,AJQT,Jh9h87,JhTh98,AhQTh8)
Furthermore I think he may bet/fold some of his range, maybe a naked AJ89 and a hand such as TT88.
The one who calls will probably have a weaker range but which may include a naked AJ. Because of his lesser stack I think that scenario is pretty rare though.
Thoughts about potting the flop and repping AJ+add-on when we in reality have 50% equity vs his get-in range. Vs AJxx we have 44% equity. And what if Villain pots the flop?
Jan. 8, 2013 | 6:01 p.m.
Thank you guys for your thorough response. I understand your reasoning and I am actually starting to change my mind in the favor of betting. I agree with you that we will seldom get raised and when we do, assuming it's a big enough raise, we fold. And when we do get called vs Qxxx we can barrel him off a lot of turn cards. We are also very happy with putting in money vs worse FDs. We like putting in money with better equity than our opponent :)
Thanks again!
Thanks again!
Jan. 8, 2013 | 5:39 p.m.
Thanks for the comments, would love to hear some more since they are contradicting each other. I tend to agree with you ZenFish, I didn't like my PFR in retrospect, since the table was full of regs and I feel more convinced a check is fine OTF now.
Jan. 8, 2013 | 12:08 a.m.
Playing on OnGame, could not convert correctly, hence Pokerhand.org.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?6516041
Readless so far, just know that everyone called are regs except BB.
Pre-flop: Too loose or fine? If too loose, what about AKQ3ss (NFD) ?
Flop: Checking because I think most hands I get it in vs will be crushing me %-wise, also because my hand is kinda disguised by check-calling, meaning I could get value if I hit my flush. Weak-tight, standard, good?
http://www.pokerhand.org/?6516041
Readless so far, just know that everyone called are regs except BB.
Pre-flop: Too loose or fine? If too loose, what about AKQ3ss (NFD) ?
Flop: Checking because I think most hands I get it in vs will be crushing me %-wise, also because my hand is kinda disguised by check-calling, meaning I could get value if I hit my flush. Weak-tight, standard, good?
Jan. 7, 2013 | 8:40 p.m.
Load more
Jan. 10, 2013 | 2:21 a.m.