zinom1

you wwsf is indeed crazy. if I was playing vs you I wouldnt fold a single bluffcatcher ;)

Im guessing IP doesnt have 22-44 in his range, The 9 gives Ip a bunch of backdoor straight draws so that might be it. The 5 shoudnt interact much with his range so...

These sims were considering pre flop rake?

Could be that on flops such as AQ4r OOP wants to x raise some bottom pair because otherwise his flatting range becomes too bottom pair heavy which increases the ev of IP's bluff on turns.

I didnt check turn

BTW villain has to shove any Ax on the river and can only shove Busted F draws 22% of the time so I guess Its very likely some people are overbluffing this spot

So i ran a sim and 20% block bet is used on river quite often but not with JJ. JJ is always checking river and calling the shove about 50% of the time.

DNegs98 I have 4.3k hands on villain. After running some sims with nodelocks I realize that I should def be golding river vs this player type because on turn theres a fex combos that are non intuitive to bet aswell low equity draws such as gutshots which vilain is probably no barreling. I didnt even nodelocked the river. Just the fact that he gets to river with such a lack of air hands makes it a fold

nice! But how low does his wwsf need to be for you to want o fold? Would you still call at say 38% wwsf ?

Why do you assume that their range is polarized just because of the big sizing. Its entirely possible that its linear and that sizing is just what they chose to use for whatever reason

DNegs98 Right because villain is suppose to bet turn with a bunch of no equity hands which then bluff this river. If villain only bets turn with good made hands and F draws then it becomes closer I guess

just ran a sim and folding QQ is pure shoving turn with average ev of 11,83. Btw flop 75% cbet is better and 33% sizing is unecessary

Just ran a sim and my combo is x raising flop 50% of the time. On the turn after callin g flop its a pure check call on that turn and on the river is mixing between call and x raise! the ev on the river of that combo after Vilain bets is +84 BB. So folding is tremendous mistake in equilibrium,but I guess we already knew that

Great analysis! Ty

I ran a sim and this is a clear call because villain is suppose to float AQ and AK which are shoving turn. But after nodelocking for more passiveness by villain it becomes super close

what about CO vs BU should we have a flatting range then?

Fold pre. As played x/r turn bigger, x/f river

I was mostly curious about turn

BU had A7s and BB 63s and BU ended up winning with A hi

So whats your approach? Do you try to implement solver strats into your game and be unassumptive like sauce? Or do you make nodelocks based on populations most common strats?