zinom1

BU had A7s and BB 63s and BU ended up winning with A hi

So whats your approach? Do you try to implement solver strats into your game and be unassumptive like sauce? Or do you make nodelocks based on populations most common strats?

I would fold even vs 2BB open

Call pre is definetely -ev

your wwsf is too low. Gotta start bluffing more and c bet less oop. Also you can open more from utg and mp and sb

links dont work

I think this video is a bit of a waste of your theory knowledge. I prefer online cashgames. However still nice video.

fold pre flop. Im surprised no1 mentioned this

In equilibrium calling is prob about 0ev so folding is good as most players arent bluffing enough at micros

Have you tried filtering hand groups? Maybe you are leaking a lot from a certain type of hand but winning with other parts of your range. if you have a preflop solver you can prob figure a good strat assuming you have a good idea of villains range.

If people are playing perfectly from a GTO standpoint than you shouldnt even play because you'll lose atleast the rake. If they are deviating from equilibrium than they are exploitable, therefore you should exploit. Figuring out in which spots to deviate from equilibrium and exploiting is what allows you to crush the games imo

against 41% wwsf turn is a very easy fold. Villain is basically a postflop nit

round2 you are losing because people tend to 3 bet quite large IP at 50nl and rake is also an issue. Vs 9% linear(?) range JJ isnt pushing alot of equity and if your calling range is tight and villain doesnt realize that he might make quite alot of mistakes postflop if you call(e.g c betting too much in spots where you have more equity) but 4 bet is also +ev(I would prob call, dont have a preflop solver so this is just intuition). I think flop is standard and turn is close between x/shove and shove. Vs the top of his range we are probably getting stacked anyway and people tend to overstab turn and not bluff enough rivers at this limit, therefore x/shove > shove > x/call

Against a thinking player I like bluffing given how strong our range is. we happened to have our weakest combo so bluffing seems good. Against some1 whos not willing to fold trips I guess prob give up because villains range is prob really Ax heavy. Also he will have KJcc, JTcc, Ktcc, T9cc some percentage which are always folding

I guess in an extremely close spot one of your criteria should be rake, sure. This is esp true pre flop

bet bigger on turn, fold vs raise

fold pre, fold flop imo

obviously yes. Rake doesnt even need to be high, if its bigger than 0 than fold.

So Im guessing we fold a lot and then continue with very strong range vs 3 bettor which will make villain make mistakes postflop such as c betting too much in spots where we have equity advantage?

Limitless had KT and the other player had small flush( 8h4h or something like that, sory dont remember)

@ 55:00 Are you betting turn with some stronger Jx or going more polarized with Kx+ and bluffs?

That redline makes me jelly. Also decent greenline :)

Apparently I cant connect to the solver.

Yeah the txt files are easy to open, while the cfr files I cant seem to open.

Yes Im also having an overbet shove sizing with this combo but I cant always choose this sizing as I dont have that many flushes in my range. So I decided that this time I was going with the smaller sizing.