GTOLABs is obviously selling soft for botting. "The trees are solved for up to six relevant sizings resulting in a split range with various distributions, meaning sometimes betsize X will be dominant, sometimes betsize Y, and sometimes check." Yeah a learning tool. lul
Dec. 21, 2019 | 1:48 a.m.
yeah I got one. Also it doesn't seem to deviate from a template much.
They wrote that " have various systems that detect players that are involved in collusion and/or are using prohibited 3-rd party software". And that I can write them more info if I want.
Nov. 23, 2019 | 9 p.m.
Tnx, Jeff. Yeah I wrote to the support. It is hard to find a proof since in poker-networks reasonably smart cheater will never give you a decent sample.
Oct. 27, 2019 | 7:31 a.m.
The player in question is Ty1erDurden1. He poped up recently, he sits all the regs,
and it seems like nobody wants to play against him.
His non-standard playing style and lobby behavior made me suspect that something questionable is going on.
Couple days ago I asked him his stars name and he said "darth vader" or something similar.
I haven't recognize this name and I promised him that I'll give him action on 1k iPoker
if he sits me in PS zoom200 and say "hello!".
By this proving that he at least is not banned by Stars.
As reply he just leaved the table.
Today once again he was sitting everybody in the lobby including me
and nobody was giving him action. After like 8th time he sitted me
I've asked him for the skype. And he asked why. I said that if he
can confirm to me that he is playing fair I'll give him action.
He taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanked and then
said that he doesn't have to confirm anything to ME.
And quitted. Not only me but also the lobby altogether.
Maybe he is a fair player and just gone to sleep
but maybe he is a cheater and is cashing out now.
Also I want to emphasize that deal I suggested to him was pretty good.
I'm a part time player and a pretty big bumhunter, so if
you can beat anybody in 1k lobby than you will be printing vs me.
Oct. 25, 2019 | 11:13 p.m.
PPS: You have the same leak as Tyler Forrester used to have: you put descriptions of colors in your tables too low. The problem is that if one stops the video to read those descriptions the video progress bar pops up and blocks the view.
Oct. 8, 2019 | 6:07 p.m.
Uri Peleg Related to the second part of homework "how to exploit a linear caller".
(1) get tighter when the turn second/third pair pairs OTR.
(2) avoid x/calling river, since there is no bluffs in his range.
(3) cbet-jam a bit more loose on rivers bringing straights.
(4) bet looser if river pairs the lowest pair.
Aug. 16, 2019 | 10:51 a.m.
Hey Antonio, could you please explain why A5 is betting so much more then A6 on 05:24. It seems like your argument explaining x with A6 should work for A5 too. My only idea is that with A5 we want to avoid bigger bets from opponents 6x. But I'm not sure and even if it is true I don't know how to make decision efficiently in play.
Aug. 12, 2019 | 11:46 p.m.
ethanrox For me it seems like the GTO solution for the subtree can be not a part of any GTO solution of a full tree. I.e. you play GTO from the turn but OP can counter your turn strategy by doing some exploitative stuff on the flop. But I'm too lazy to try to invent the example.
Aug. 11, 2019 | 10:23 p.m.
28:14 You say we can 4bet ATo for value vs 33% 3betting range which sounds pretty crazy for me. Could you explain in more details please.
I assume that reasons are position and ability to dominate weaker Ax, Tx... But still ATo has only like 40% 3bets vs 85% open so for me it looks like it should be pretty passive vs 33% 3bet