Rylandebeeld

Seems like x/c has been popular in the responces but i operate mostly on a lead 1/3 pot with range on neutral boards?

Lots of dbl barrels or get theres vs range and puts club draws in kind of a silly position of not knowing to call or 3bet.

Villian should have few open/call 3bet flop holdings here so we are often safe to see a turn and deny equity to balony hands like JTdd

People suggesting more suited connectors are going to run into a lot of reverse implied odds when OOP opening into 5 villians. Pretty sure thats with 87s and worse and all folds.

Fair point Queen! I wonder if thats a leak in most of my game making assumptions too aggressively about the range of hands my weaker villains are going to be playing....Appreciate the feedback!

Ranges constructed Based on Raise your edge elementary cash ranges!

I think the only mistake is pre- Vs a 19% opening range your seeing a 4% calling range vs BU 3bet; This is going to look like AJs/AQs AKo; 88 thought QQ and then some other hands are going to be 4betting that are better.

The idea with flatting OTB is to get into more showdown situations in position when dealing with high pairs. While keeping a protected range vs the blinds and a tough open/call 3bet range of the UTG player.

This hand is tough because you are now playing a bloated pot in position vs a very narrow strong range with a holding that in most cases wants to just make it to the end vs UTG villian.

Also now that you have shown a tendency to 3bet in position these good regs will quickly 4bet punish you in the future and you will end up doing a lot of 3bet from the button; a position of mostly flat calls.

As for the actual flop and turn I think we have to call flop once in postion but vs such a strong range I think we are fine mucking it on the turn rather than committing our stack in a situation where villain has a range advantage and betting lead.

I play a 4bet/fold all hands strategy from small blind and this is far from my ranges that want to be played here. Makes rest of hand a little tricky with a percieved wide range which should change your play post.

Your definitly leaking money in SB with the attitude of "meh sometimes ill try and hit with cute hands"

Flop your going to have a TON of natural bluffs and with sets/straights I like your sizing here....its not bad.

Turn you earn even more bluffs and you put a lot of his range into a tough spot on the turn; with lots of bluffs and some nutted holding we want to be thinking more to size up because of board and less.

As played I like an overbet shove on river- draws brick and your never bluffing 45% pot. Stack those sets and overpairs :)

We have played on stars together quite a bit not sure if you recognize me or not

I agree; makes for a very weird line when you lead flop- This hand performs at its best value as a bluff catch in small pot 😊

However if villian does check through flop you could go for 2 streets of value turn/river on very safe cards. Never getting 3 streets of leading value here.

The last hand though 🙏 🎁

Quality content and excellent though process reveal! I like your 98bluff i believe thst is the most natural selection; Im thinking at low stakes people will bet bet call far too wide on there valur range that it may not be profitable against the loose passive recs; but i love the thought process and the selection 👍

Ah yes I meant the 4 way Huni hand; I had figured beforehand that the bet was an optimistic on his part. Sounds bad to give free cards to 3 players but Id rather do that and lose a small pot rather than lose a bigger one vs uncapped ranges.

Just protection with a wider range- 30bb is majority Ax holdings.

Chip Ev standard but with a tighter range because of Icm combined with the ICM pressure on yourself. Like he said with a tight range it doesn't get good quick when you add hands but it gets very bad very quick when you take out hands from a normal construction.

I want a RIO jumpsuit to wear for the rest of my life

Excellent video as always Apotheosis ; Super interesting that the 99 from Linnus is even ever considered close or even bad I have for sure always just sigh called that spot with like 77 AQ+; Super Eye opening. And its interesting to see the check back with the Ax holdings on AKx boards; I assumed this was a range advantage board and always a bet for hero- did not even consider the fact that KQ hands need protection here.

Interested in the Hhecklan AT bet 4 ways; If the board is AK rather than AJ does the protection of hands like KQ still apply here or is this different because its multi way and hecklan wasn't the pre flop raiser?

Thanks kruk and RIO team

I believe the length of winter is somewhat the same; especially on the coast. Similar weather to coastal US states Im sure; There is no shortage in selection in Vancouver; this thread is not really to argue the plausibility of Vancouver being a possible winning area; just looking for some kind of monetary goal.

Until reaching 5/10 the selection of game is effectively the same Im sure.

why?

I could very well be wrong; but my thinking is that at the lower stakes the average opponent is going to be less mindful of opening ranges opening; Just imagine a weak opener with a range of all pairs all connectors some suited gappers; We are going to crush that all too common player type. I didnt mean there are NO 4bets; just less than proper at these stakes

Id prefer a 3bet here- isolate a narrow range of open 3/b call of the utg player and absolutely wreck him on low boards. Population shouldn't find too many 4bets and our hand can flop some lovely flops if all contestants decide they want to come along.

As far as call vs. fold I can't fathom folding for 208 to win 984 to 1100 in chips (bb c/f option behind)

If you do want to take the passive route as some prefer I imagine; I think was to ensure your BB isn't one to muck around with you limp; calling 1200 more 3 ways with no lead or control of the pot doesn't make me nearly as happy.

TLDR- 3bet a good size > call > fold

assuming a flat pre the line stays the same? Cbetting our air with BD equity and then allowing a free card coming w/ our draw and taking a showdown on most/if not all rivers?

Much Appreciated; Just started the essential learning path course and played that one right before listening to apotheosis on ICM; got my head turning on how tight the mid stacks are forced to play at this stack depths. Interesting to see that a commonplace no brainer shove before is actually right on the border of acceptability.

Appreciate the work.

Curious of you could post w/ the payout of the last 18 with chipstacks as well; I do believe the other stacks should change this decision quite considerably

Easily just a shove preflop- worse might call and your equity is fine- plus lots if folds! Just remember that your shoving most P.P up to 20BB so 14 isn't nearly too large

I think calling all Tx is too wide but i want to keep AT so im folding QT as its less good of a bluff catcher and for the same reason I QQ is close...the rest seem like obvious lead check/call call off hands....just concerned with calling too wide with an already wide range.