paparookiec1's avatar


5 points

If our equities are so good on ace high boards here, then why do you guys think Pio solver is telling us to only cbet aj2ss, a97 rainbow and a54 rainbow 52, 32 and 59% ? The ranges in the doc and in pio are very similar.

June 1, 2019 | 9:57 p.m.

Oh I see. So it is a matter of ok I think they'll have 3x up and force them to adjust a bit ok.

May 23, 2019 | 9:31 p.m.

Dumb question here but this is kind of far above my average stake for cash. Why do you not just make it 15$? Doesn't that make it seem like we have more than a few tables going?

May 23, 2019 | 12:17 a.m.

Nice video. If you care to elaborate: On 9-4-2ss do you agree more with your assumption that our check raise should be higher, or would you tend to side with the solvers check raise range in a harder game like 2-5 zoom?
Also, in this spot, it would be more important to throw in check raises with cards under a 9

May 22, 2019 | 10:45 p.m.

If you feel like elaborating, can you explain a little more about in hand one on why your KJ, which blocks villians blufffs of course, is a better hand to bluff the river with than a busted flush draw?

May 16, 2019 | 6:55 p.m.

NH. As played i think this is more of a river sizing question, I think 14.5 bb river bet is better with more history and maybe 9k-11k is better with less history depending on interaction intervals but its a nice question to ponder.
On the turn, we are supposed to barrel here 60%. I think you made the right play and bought the showdown correctly. Vs the sb, thats where it can be more of a check as their range is alot more linear.

Oct. 12, 2018 | 5:14 p.m.

Load more uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy