JimmyGlass's avatar

JimmyGlass

188 points

@21:45 you say 'there is no particular need to Cbet' at 882ss.
It might be too oversimplified view by myself, but don't we have A-high (weak SD at this point) and high expected FE -> thus cbet a default play?

May 9, 2022 | 6:24 p.m.

more 5 card content please

May 3, 2022 | 7:51 p.m.

14min mark. QQJJT$ds

I get that it's premium but when we 3b vs that shallow of a stack we mostly care about 'cold EQ' and having blockers to 4b range (or let's just say having A is pretty crucial).
we're 48/52 behind vs 20% RFI range, +3 remaining plays can cold 4b (granted, we don't mind too much getting 4b, but still)
* between RFI player and BTN/SB/BB they would have AA ~37,5% of the time.
* obv in 80bb+ slam dunk 3b

anyway, don't you think all of the above mentioned pushes us to actually cc vs shorty here?

May 3, 2022 | 6:33 p.m.

Comment | JimmyGlass commented on $10/$25 PLO Live!

Very easy to watch/enjoyable and practical format imo. Would like to see more.
J9 is fairly straight-froward fold w multiple players behind, you only really need ppt to show that.
I wonder about KK from HJ hand (@Q92-2. 3ways). Assuming they don’t bluff raise enough, don’t connect with a deuce much and BU is capped (no Q9+) after flop check, shouldn’t delay Chet be higher EV-line here? We only behind blind’s slowplays and BU’s (rare) AA. Sure, visibility is crap, but we kinda trying to eliminate this factor by betting. Thoughts?

Congrats on plo debut!

April 18, 2022 | 6:40 p.m.

28.35 table 2. on the turn - do you think he'll find enough worse hands by the turn to justify calling off?
on the flop we obv in a great shape, his donk range might have all 2 pair+, JT, straights. but when this turn comes we only really chop w T7 and ahead vs JT (that we block; maybe we can sprinkle in some J+KQ no sure), feels like we're dead too often here, no? even at spr 0.6

ty for the video, as always

March 22, 2022 | 4:49 a.m.

solid material. might be bit more digestible if you have 2/3 of video as monker+presentation. 1/3 showing your HH related to the topic (where you can discuss how to adjust given stacksizes, tendencies; what mistakes where made and what details to watch out for). Should make video as a whole less dry imo.
thanks for the content

March 1, 2022 | 9:44 p.m.

not too related to the topic of the video, but would you say there is any merit in opening for less then a pot in ANTE game? and let's assume opponents are reacting similarly vs x4 and x6.5 (games is 5card PLO)

Jan. 27, 2022 | 12:24 a.m.

great video and delivery of material
you've made it mad confusing by switching Vision's bet/check colors in your presentation (smh) :))

Jan. 1, 2022 | 8:23 p.m.

Comment | JimmyGlass commented on $25/$50 HU PLO

@25.10 you didn't comment on top table (turn A77-6ss board).
I think I understand idea of not leading turn(maybe ever on this texture), but when he delays OTT I find a lot of incentives (specifically with our side cards = unblocking draws) to x/R. Is it a mix between x/C and x/R here, would you x/R more often when 100bb effective? maybe you can elaborate on the spot a bit.

@32.03 as well, would like to hear you comment if its standard for you or some kind of deviation. A83cc at AK3-T. do we make a lot of hands with high EQ to fold here? do we try to make better hands to fold as part of reason why we bet? we deny ev by potting, meaning he won't be able to bluff us of better hand OTR when it goes x/x?
any particular reasons why pot>check here?

thanks for the video

Dec. 25, 2021 | 3:39 a.m.

thanks for the video.
same format as caller of 3b OOP (COvBU, EPvsCO) I'd find helpful too.

also, if you can do video on 'most effective ways to use vision'.
I'm mostly doing 'steak' thing and finding it pretty effective, but how to get max value from 'practice' mode would be great (I assume something like that might have been released before)

Dec. 14, 2021 | 8:43 p.m.

generally like the format.
maybe sticking to specific spot/scenario (leading in SRP or multy-way stabs IP, etc.) would be better

Dec. 12, 2021 | 9:09 p.m.

This type of content - (beta) solver + pre analysis is good,
if you'd stop a bit on simple postflop decisions (cbet vs xback decisions, etc) - would be greatly appreciated.
thanks for the video.

Dec. 9, 2021 | 7:56 p.m.

Good stuff as always, some eye opening ideas regarding k77-flop hand.
- do you considered KJJ5$ss flat a default (around 9min mark)?
- Think towards the end there was A763$ss SB flat too
My take was that these hands are marginal at best (first has not great playability with players left behind: potentially MW often; and A-suit weak rundown is just too weak and OOP EQ realisation wouldn’t be great) and word is - rake on gg isn’t all that low even at HS.
Cheers

Sept. 21, 2021 | 12:07 a.m.

enjoyed video as always.
question: don't you think that we suppose to squeeze way less JJ$ds (and less overall) when BU RFIs solver range, but folds vs 3b/sqz barely ever?
*you've touched on this a bit, but maybe you can elaborate regarding correlation of RFI's strategy vs 3b and our 3b/sqz freq.
thanks

Sept. 19, 2021 | 7:40 p.m.

2nd this. +paired boars in SRP, 3b pots

Sept. 16, 2021 | 4:16 p.m.

enjoying the series a lot.
learning a lot about icm influence at late stages.
on a side note: please consider making one for early/mid-stages PLO MTTs
thanks

July 13, 2021 | 2:57 a.m.

would be interested in seeing similar format but vs weaker fields w\ more comments on deviation from gto.
e.i What blockers we should be looking for to double barrel given opponent doesn't come close to mdf; x-combos are bluffing in equilibrium but we should deviate to passiveness with those when villain in too much of a station, etc. In other words, sprinkling in some exploits (and I guess we need different environment) would be nice. Hope it all makes sense

Liked the debut a lot, looking forward for more.

March 18, 2021 | 10:13 p.m.

I don't have access to any solves, but in my book it's frequent bet.
His range is super wide (we open ~30% I guess). We have more K$B$B type of hands, when it comes to KK he prob has some advantage, but it shouldn't decide the situation in favor of not betting (from exploit point of view anyway)
I'd expect field to overfold here, thus bet often (worth Kx -bet; Kx with good side cards should be okay check, bet lots of bluffs with some BD EQ, gutters etc)
Maybe someone else would have more sophisticated thoughts on this spot.

June 30, 2020 | 4:43 a.m.

Hello,
Looking for one or few people to discuss strategy at mentioned stakes (PLO Hi 6max) maybe PLO mtts as well.
Potentially recording\sweating session, working with pokerjuice, etc.
DM if have serious interest.

cheers,
Andrew

April 21, 2020 | 7:21 p.m.

I'd say sqz is borderline, solver might do that frequently - but he is going to face many folds from RFI, we on the other hand - unlikely (I assuming people in 10c\20c don't like to fold pre much), in addition to that you have decent chance to get cc from players left to act.

OOP I'd never squeeze that unless one of villains is shallow and can reopen the action.
Postflop, given spr it's easy pot-call, imo. We should have enough FE+EQ here

Think about how many better flop you gonna get with this hand (I'd say 6JKr is top25% at least),
if you hesitate to gii here with spr ~2, dwhat makes you think squeeze is +EV?

April 21, 2020 | 7:08 p.m.

Post | JimmyGlass posted in Chatter: Issue w\ PPT

recently got odds oracle pro version.
wanted to run couple of simulations for 5card PLO High
after creating a macro for a range I had in mind I try to run simulations, but this error keeps showing up.
their support didn't respond yet, so maybe someone here has an idea of how to fix it?
http://prntscr.com/lo17rx

it was the same when I did put some long (maybe too tangled) ranges in to player1 box.

regards,
Andrew

Nov. 28, 2018 | 12:26 p.m.

Comment | JimmyGlass commented on basic Math question

if I got you right, its pot is 10$, villains bets 10$ and is AI. for a breakeven call here we would need 33%, anything above this number would make money in a long run. (mind rake)

$1200 in the pot, V bets $800. 0,8\2,8 = 0.285, so 28,5% EQ vs his range is what you need to breakeven.

vs pot-size bet you need 33% EQ,
vs 1\2 bet you need 25%. you can use this two numbers to approximately estimate what equity do you need to continue.

Nov. 6, 2018 | 9:03 a.m.

Given the SPR,
I would say pot-call is +EV (you can make a sim for Shove vs SOR to check it)
benefit of this line - vs reg we make some better hands (QQ,bad KK, maybe some Tx) to fold, as well as some hands w\decent EQ (6xxx, naked Gutter, even though it's hard to have for him gutshot w\ no pair; some T:RR). also, given T-blocker we're unlikely to be in too bad of a shape when have to call off his shove
x\Call is also the line I would examine for sure. Esp. w\bdfd (it add run-outs coverage, visability). I'd say x\call is bit more preferable w\ higher spr.
if you have 1\2 sizing on this board, I'd rather not include this hand into this sub-range

Aug. 27, 2018 | 9:45 a.m.

so, it's anonymous games?

June 1, 2018 | 6:41 a.m.

Post | JimmyGlass posted in Chatter: Nevada, Online PLO opportunities

Hey,
can anyone give me general idea on the current state of online poker (PLO cash in partucular) in NV?
I might be moving in, so would like to know how many tables @.50\1 - 3\6 PL there is.
due to being located outside of states can't dowload Ingnition or other sites that avaliable there and see it myself
also what is quality of game (comparing to ACR or Stars)?
a screenshot would highly appreciated

thanks in avdvance,
JG

May 31, 2018 | 1:18 p.m.

you can use PJ's 3way tool to calculate it.
PM me a pre-converted hand (in text) I'll show you how it could be done

April 2, 2018 | 3:18 p.m.

very reasonable shove imo, we might make him fold better hands (QQ\KK), and hands w\ EQ (Tx), 56-combos are rare in MP range, but we still have to make sure we dont give this type of hands free cards.
I dont know if xback could be higher EV.
maybe it makes sense to xback this holding to have some dd otr with b\x\ line, vs unknown I wouldn't bother about it too much.

April 2, 2018 | 3:13 p.m.

x\call is alright due to the reasons you mentioned, but depending on villain's tendencies - could go for a value bet (vs worse Ax). Also would go bigger otf, not a big deal I guess

Dec. 24, 2017 | 9:15 a.m.

idk what is right for pre. I won't call SB here unless there is bad player in pot already.

otf, lets see positives about x\r:
1)we make him fold\make marginal call w\ pair+wrap\comboDraws that we dominate,
2) we make it easier for us to play by x\r, as we create lower SPR and thus taking away positional advantage for btn.

cons:
1) we likely to isolate ourselves vs bigger hand, I don't think 'passive reg' would b\gii here pretty much anything that we're now ahead of.
2) don't let him bluff on future streets when we hit our outs (lets significant here probably)

too many possible texture shifts at future streets, I guess I like x\r. not entirely sure it's best option

Nov. 8, 2017 | 4:43 p.m.

Liked the video.
in case you're looking for PJ videos ideas, then something like this might be interesting, imho:
'fighting back at certain bords in 3b pot as caller'. (when hero is CO\BTN and faces 3bo6\8 and what types of bord-structures we can\should attack OTF)

any range v range stuff would be good I guess.

July 24, 2017 | 1:08 p.m.

Load more
Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy